- Joined
- Jan 2, 2023
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 7
- Guild Total
- 1
I'm not a D-25 expert, I'm sure that topic was discussed here in great detail in the past. Also I don't have Hans book in my hands right now, he should also mention it there as it goes until 1977. Could have been the price list in Nov 1975 that was also incorrect.Oh, wow... I never knew that about all-mahogany D-25M in 1975, Ralf. Were they actually labeled this way, or was that some lettering they just put in the catalog?
Sorry, Ralf. What I meant was the question of whether an all-mahogany D-25 (of which I'm well-aware, of course) was ever called a "D-25M" on a real label. I would've expected just D-25. I think the 1975 catalog you showed above had the "M" in it as a marketing distinction, not seen on the label ?? I don't know.I'm not a D-25 expert, I'm sure that topic was discussed here in great detail in the past. Also I don't have Hans book in my hands right now, he should also mention it there as it goes until 1977. Could have been the price list in Nov 1975 that was also incorrect.
Here are some old discussions:
. . .
Ralf
Can we have a photo of this F-20M? Thanks!Ya, it is a spruce top like the other F20's!
It's such a good looking finish imo, just haven't seen any other photos of that specific model/finish
Can we have a photo of this F-20M? Thanks!
It took me a solid day to decipher TRC, but I have cracked the code and will switch it aroundThat bridge looks nice!
But please turn around that TRC !!! It really hurts seeing it that way!
Ralf
Yes we've seen reports of all-hog D25's being labeled "M". Originally I suspected it was due to overlapping production during the change to spruce tops and the known potential to cause label-writer confusion. Don't recall ever seeing a "legitimate" explanation.Sorry, Ralf. What I meant was the question of whether an all-mahogany D-25 (of which I'm well-aware, of course) was ever called a "D-25M" on a real label. I would've expected just D-25. I think the 1975 catalog you showed above had the "M" in it as a marketing distinction, not seen on the label ?? I don't know.
Interesting. So, maybe the better question, Al, is whether or not there were any cherry-stained, all-mahogany D-25s. What do you think?Yes we've seen reports of all-hog D25's being labeled "M". Originally I suspected it was due to overlapping production during the change to spruce tops and the known potential to cause label-writer confusion. Don't recall ever seeing a "legitimate" explanation.
Member Spiderman had one he said was a '76. I always thought he must have been mistaken until I saw more mentions and then finally even these price list//catalog references.
Yep, seen 'em, and they're in that '75 price list as "D25C". Cherry was also one of the original finish colors in '68.Interesting. So, maybe the better question, Al, is whether or not there were any cherry-stained, all-mahogany D-25s. What do you think?
In any case, it's good to know that a D-25M from this period is not necessarily a spruce-topped guitar. I'm pretty sure I would've said that before this thread.