adorshki
Reverential Member
I'm pretty sure there would also have been the time pressure to simply get the instruments liquidated; taking the warranty question out of the equation would have simplified any deal whether they were worried about down-the-road claims or not.capnjuan said:But I think the over-riding factor was that FMIC wanted to be off the warranty hook for the out-years obligation to repair or replace whatever they had in Tacoma no matter how it got there....The 'proof' is that if all the blems were as minor as the re-sellers say they were, then the blems could have been corrected by Guild itself at modest expense. The economic fact is that new, warranted guitars sell for more than unwarranted guitars so it should have been in Guild's interest to fix them. But, at some point Guild had to have asked itself 'suppose we fix them, are we willing to be on the warranty hook for them?' and that answer apparently came up no. So, whatever was on hand in Tacoma, regardless of why it was there, was stamped 'used' and dumped on the gray market. This would explain why otherwise perfectly fit Traditional and Contemporary models could be on the market without a warranty.
2 additional points: as a "bolt-on" system theoretically it would have drastically lowered the cost of a neck reset, and that "spider" that attached to the top was supposed to have acoustic effect.capnjuan said:The neckblock: Traditional dovetail joints are labor-intensive and require a fair amount of skill; a machined chunk of graphite ... I think you know where I'm going. I'm not a luthier or a mechanical engineer but I think in addition to getting a more reliable, repeatable neck joint, the block system would have minimized those nagging cracks that appear along the tail of the fingerboard running to the soundhole ... so, maybe the block system was to fix more than just neck-to-body problems.
Just wantd to add a couple of things to your excellent re-"cap".