You're right Jonas; I don't know what economic development policy is where you are but, by default (sorry Steve), US cities are left to compete for new employers and jobs in the form of tax breaks, cash advances for every new employee, municipally-financed infrastructure improvements, and similar inducements ... and in recent years, the city of Hartford CT hasn't been doing any better than Detroit MI's 0-15 football Lions ...sitka_spruce said:I would say the title We Gotta Get Out Of This Place in Guilds case could be standing for any of New York City, Hoboken, Westerly, Corona and Tacoma - each of different reasons. I see there are 20 Hartfords in the US alone and 4 Hartfords/ Hertfords in the UK. To that 5 New Hartfords can be found in the US (according to Wikipedia)
New Hartford CT wants to borrow the name 'Hartford' but without any of its ugly municipal baggage ... which is why our noobie was so concerned that we make the distinction ... I was only acknowledging the distinction he wanted us to appreciate. New Hartford sounds like a Reston VA or Columbia MD; white, low-rise/low-density, real estate development-driven, economically-exclusive haven from the muck and mire of Hartford CT, Washington DC, Baltimore MD, and other big US cities.
Yes Bluesdan ... but just one call ... and keep it brief :wink: