I read through the whole thread, and this one, too. Having a little "us vs. them" rivalry is okay, I suppose, but I think THIS thread is off base. AGF is an excellent site--one of the best of any kind on the entire internet. That thread is a perfect example of it. Two, maybe three, posters said things about Guild that were wrong, and the weight of opinion corrected them. Not just that, but correctly pointed anyone reading the thread to LTG as the better place to get accurate information about Guild. Just like when I wanted information about microphones, I got some at AGF, but they pointed me to Gearslutz. The classical sub-forum might point you to Delcamp.
Don't you think that it's at least true that, over the years, Guild has not been given a fair chance with respect to business and marketing that was on par with the quality of the instruments being produced? I'm not sure whether that's right, but isn't the gist of LTG opinion that Guilds do not earn in the marketplace the price and reputation that they deserve based on sound? There's at least something to discuss, there, about whether Guild has been handled well from a business and marketing viewpoint, and if you don't happen to camp out on LTG, do you think you would have any information about where Guild is right about now? Aren't you glad that "Where is Guild about now?' is being discussed in the far-larger audience of AGF, with your opportunity to put correct information out there?
Anyway, yes, of course there are some distracting posters or waste-of-time threads on AGF. But to say or imply that it is generally a source of misinformation is not fair at all. The scope of topics discussed on AGF is 100X broader than what is on LTG. A topic may stagger for a few posts, but almost invariably lands in dependable truth, just as the thread in question did.
Okay, now I'll take my punishment....