Maybe some hope for Guild

tommym

Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
894
Reaction score
315
Guilds have always been really hard to come by in my neck of the woods. A long long time ago I had a chance to play a F-212 XL. I really preferred the sound of the F-212 XL (mahogany) over that of my F-512 (rosewood). So I sold the F-512, only to find out that getting my hand on a new or used F-212 XL was easier said than done. I ended up getting a Taylor 555 12 string as getting my hands on one of these was a simple matter of pulling out my wallet. I still have the Taylor 555 today. It's was nice to see the new batch of F-212 XL come out of New Hartford, but I couldn't really justify selling my Taylor 555 just to pickup a F-212 XL, as there was not much to be gained sound / quality wise in that exchange.

Tommy
 

Neal

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
4,875
Reaction score
1,683
Location
Charlottesville, VA
I think the desire on the Standard Series was to keep the cost of the bling down, while providing equivalent tone and playability to the Traditional Series. I watched a video of all of the hand work that goes into head stock inlay, and it represents a lot of added steps, time and expense.

Neal
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,806
Reaction score
8,933
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
FMIC's horrible distribution policy,

It may be a moot point but this pushed a few of my buttons so I have to respond. New Hartford made considerably less than 5,000 guitars per year. Approximately 30% of those were distributed outside of the US. So that leaves 3,500 guitars in the States. To play with the numbers, figure two dealers per state that stock them and you have 35 guitars per store per year. And in this silly scenario we have two dealers per state so the folks in Delaware are going to be fine but the Texans have a lot of driving to do. The problem is not with FMICs distribution, it is with the fact that production was severely limited. That was the deliberate choice by FMIC.

I understand the angst of the "try before you buy" folks and understand how lucky I have been because with three trips to New Hartford and two stocking dealers within 30 miles, I have more experience with the product line than most, but at some point complaining about distribution when there are a limited quantity of instruments to distribute points the finger in the wrong place.
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
California used to be the 5th largest economy.
According to this, only for two years, '84 and '85:
http://econpost.com/californiaeconomy/california-economy-ranking-among-world-economies
Prior to that, since the '70's, 7th largest, behind Italy.
And specifically:
However, in 2002, California was overtaken by China's economy and fell back to the 7th largest spot, And in 2003, when Italy's economy regained its normal pace of growth, Italy surpassed California and pushed it back another spot to eighth biggest economy, the rank it has occupied every year since 2003.
I respectfully submit that China's ascension in the ranking is a far more relevant factor affecting our ranking than the "business climate".
Note also that that's dated 2011. In 2013 CA GDP was $2 trillion compared to 2011's $1.89 trill.. That's GROWTH.
Here's more current info, dated July 2013, from here:
http://www.ccsce.com/PDF/Numbers-July-2013-CA-Economy-Rankings-2012.pdf
"California Poised to Move Up in World Economy Rankings in 2013
California is poised to pass Italy and the Russian Federation and become the world�s eighth-largest economy in 2013. California, Italy and the Russian Federation were in a virtual tie in 2012 for eighth-tenth place in the world rankings with a gross domestic product (GDP) of $2.0 trillion. The state GDP is the value of all goods and services produced in California and is comparable to the national definition.
According to World Bank estimates, China was the world�s second-largest economy in 2012 with a GDP just over half of the U.S. total. Japan, Germany and France were the next three largest world economies in 2012. With the European economies in recession, California pulled even with Italy and moved closer to the GDPs of France and the United Kingdom
."
Most studies I have read show California is NOT a good business climate. Hence... the departures to other states. Manufacturing is leaving. High tech is leaving.
Even though I got about 15 years of employment in the high-tech orbit myself, in components and computer sales, I'm almost tempted to say "good riddance", since we're still trying to figure out how to clean up the groundwater contamination left from 30 glorious years of IC manufacturing in the Santa Clara Valley, that contains what used to be fully a quarter of the TOP 1% of arable land quality ON THE PLANET. This valley single-handedly produced virtually the entire national output of plums (prunes) and apricots for almost 100 years and was a pretty big source of cherries, almonds, and walnuts too.
I could see acres of all those and more within a 10-minute bike ride anywhere in the valley up through about '74.
THAT's when IC manufacturing hit critical mass and became a HUGE employer, driving construction of both manufacturing infrastructure and housing, (and NEVER enough housing) where humble fruit was once farmed.
High tech has not left and won't leave, it is simply converted to R & D for the large scale circuit manufacturers and other forms of high tech such as bio-tech and solar power development, or more recently Seagate buying the defunct Solyndra property and starting up ops..
Oh yeah, don't forget Tesla's electric cars.
I guess it depends on where you live. High-tech is definitely not leaving the Bay Area. Not that the Bay Area is representative of the state's economy....
Yes, you're a prime example, having relocated from the east coast. And actually the Bay Area is a pretty good micrcosm of the state's economy, except we don't have the agricultural weighting we did as recently as the '70's .
The bay area is just a weird area all together.
John, thought you lived in Southern Cal? Are you speaking as a long-term resident? Not that the term is neccessarily inaccurate, but if you don't live here you may not be aware of just how much cultural diversity there is here, I think THAT'S what makes us a unique region in the state. And don't judge a whole region by my example either. :biggrin-new:
How they vote doesn't match a lot of the state, but because they are close to Sacramento, everyone seems to think that IS how we all would vote.
Here's what the casual observer always misses: AGRICULTURE is the 900lb economic Gorilla in the state, singlehandedly contributing 16% of the US GDP from '05-'09.
Source here:
http://www.fieldtomarket.org/report...conomic_AgriContributionToNatlAndStateGDP.pdf
Those farmers and their related economic enterprises tend to be pretty darn conservative. I've been saying for twenty years now that California's got a conservative (I use a bit more colorful term) backbone as deep as big as the central valleys, which tends to corroborate what you're saying.
I finally realized that after I watched many an election prove that the Bay Area and the Los Angeles urban area are islands of liberal political sympathies in this state.
BUT, in the end, if we draw different opinions based on different sources, I guess that's just how it goes.
I still think it'd be a great place for Fender to make Guilds.
:tranquillity:
 
Last edited:

Watasha

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
234
Reaction score
0
It may be a moot point but this pushed a few of my buttons so I have to respond. New Hartford made considerably less than 5,000 guitars per year. Approximately 30% of those were distributed outside of the US. So that leaves 3,500 guitars in the States. To play with the numbers, figure two dealers per state that stock them and you have 35 guitars per store per year. And in this silly scenario we have two dealers per state so the folks in Delaware are going to be fine but the Texans have a lot of driving to do. The problem is not with FMICs distribution, it is with the fact that production was severely limited. That was the deliberate choice by FMIC.

I understand the angst of the "try before you buy" folks and understand how lucky I have been because with three trips to New Hartford and two stocking dealers within 30 miles, I have more experience with the product line than most, but at some point complaining about distribution when there are a limited quantity of instruments to distribute points the finger in the wrong place.

My dealer said FMIC made dealers buy X number of guitars & amps to get into the Fender/Squier stock, then he also had to buy into Gretsch to get Guild...and then buy into Guild. That is a horrible business model. To my earlier point: If you can't get guitars where you need them to be in order to sell them, that's bad distribution. You aren't adequately distributing your product. It involves more than just having trucks to haul the guitars. Also, Fender deliberately limited production & then turned around & blamed lack of production for the NH factory closure. No disrespect intended to you of course, I just can't take Fender or their policies seriously at this point.
 
Last edited:

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Do they custom build them?
I know you wouldn't get one unless it's equipped with the extra zombie protection package.
No, no, you seem to be forgetting, they originated the Zombie Apocalypse Warranty, it's standard.
"Mmehh", not for me.
One 'o these might be though, for the daily commute :
TerraCraftFINClosed_0013_960width.jpg

And no, I'm not kidding.
Fully enclosed leaning reverse trike, made in California.
:semi-twins:
 
Last edited:

JohnW63

Enlightened Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
6,360
Reaction score
2,266
Location
Southern California
Guild Total
4
John, thought you lived in Southern Cal? Are you speaking as a long-term resident?

All my life, so about 50 years. Trust me, the people down here often just shake their heads about the stuff that comes out of the bay area, news wise, or out of Sacramento. Both places seem to be in a world of their own.
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
All my life, so about 50 years. Trust me, the people down here often just shake their heads about the stuff that comes out of the bay area, news wise, or out of Sacramento.
I trust ya.
In fact, they're not alone, and I live here...
Now San Francisco, I'm tellin' ya, that's a weird place, even by Bay Area standards...
:friendly_wink:
 
Last edited:

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,806
Reaction score
8,933
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
My dealer said FMIC made dealers buy X number of guitars & amps to get into the Fender/Squier stock, then he also had to buy into Gretsch to get Guild...and then buy into Guild.

My dealer explicitly told me that policy with regard to Guilds changed for him circa 2011. He thought it was a vast improvement over the previous policy. He also said that as a result it was now easier for him to stock and sell Guilds than before. He noted that dealing with FMIC was a PITA because sometimes they segregated brands (different in house sales reps) and sometimes one call would handle multiple brands. However he was explicit in stating several times that the stocking requirement for Guild was independent of any other FMIC product.

You can have the best, most effective distribution system in the world and if there is not enough product to distribute people are going to complain about availability.
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,806
Reaction score
8,933
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
Also, Fender deliberately limited production & then turned around & blamed lack of production for the NH factory closure.

I read things in a similar way but tend to blame the restructuring of FMIC's ownership and debt and the resulting new leadership for the decision that the factory was no longer profitable enough to operate. So in my mind the FMIC management that limited production and the FMIC management that closed NH were not the same management, or at least not reacting to the same priorities.
 
Top