Starfire III, LB 1 or Dynasonics?

JackNangle

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
20
Guild Total
1
Hello all, first post here. I tried using the search function but couldn’t find much useful info. I’m looking at getting a Newark Street Starfire III later this year and would like opinions on whether to go for a LB 1 equipped model or a Dynasonic one.
I have two guitars with Guild Dynasonics - a Gretsch Electromatic Jet and a partscaster Esquire so I know that I like them (even if they’re not that accurate to old ones). I have a HS Filtertron equipped Gretsch G5422 and an Epiphone Riviera with mini humbuckers also.
I was initially drawn to a Dyna Starfire III for the light weight and similar tones to my Jet, but the more I read about the LB-1 pickups, the more curious I get, even with the volume difference people complain about. So what’s people’s preference in these guitars? Any comparison videos of the two pickup types in a Starfire III?
Thanks in advance
 

JackNangle

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
20
Guild Total
1
the logicial question is "what kind of sound are you after/what kind of music do you play?"
Thanks for the reply and a good point - gritty almost clean up to Neil Young lead. My main amp is a Supro Black Magic
 

HeyMikey

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
4,869
Location
MA
Guild Total
9
That sounds fairly broad. Are you looking for one guitar to do it all, or do you switch off for certain songs/tones?
 

JackNangle

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
20
Guild Total
1
I have a number of guitars to cover different ground, mostly for recording. My initial idea was something lighter than my Jet that could cover similar ground (mostly overdubbed jangly stuff or dirty lead) but with its own voice
 

JackNangle

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
20
Guild Total
1
I should also add I’m not a big fan of Gibson PAF style pickups, and have an Epiphone Wilshire with P90s also. I guess what I’m asking is which type of pickup do you feel is more suited to the Starfire III?
 

JackNangle

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
20
Guild Total
1
Am I right in thinking the LB-1 and Guild dynasonics are a straight swap? So if I got a regular SFIII I could swap Dynasonics in later if I felt the need to?
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
461
Reaction score
186
Location
North Zeamaizistan
Am I right in thinking the LB-1 and Guild dynasonics are a straight swap? So if I got a regular SFIII I could swap Dynasonics in later if I felt the need to?

No, they're mounted differently. But you do have some flexibility in each direction -- if you get it with the regular humbuckers, you can make Dynas work later if you use a small spacer (or you can use a ring-mounted tv jones that will work ok with the humbucker rings). If you go with the Dyna mount, you can use any top-mount TV Jones pickups, which would allow you to use a more vintage-accurate Dyna, his filter'trons, etc.
 
Last edited:

HeyMikey

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
4,869
Location
MA
Guild Total
9
No, they're mounted differently. But you do have some flexibility in each direction -- if you get it with the regular humbuckers, you can make Dynas work later if you use a small spacer (or you can use a ring-mounted tv jones that will work ok with the humbucker rings). If you go with the Dyna mount, you can use any top-mount TV Jones pickups, which would allow you to use a more vintage-accurate Dyna, his filter'trons, etc.
That’s good to know. I’ve thought the same thing since finding one with good Dyna’s is harder/pricier than with buckers.
 

HeyMikey

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
4,869
Location
MA
Guild Total
9
What is different wrt the new ones? Less sensitive, not as hot, less mirophonic?

How would you rate them compared to the earlier 2000’s and to the 2K’s ?
 
Last edited:

parker_knoll

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
410
Location
London
the new ones are the same as the second round of ‘90s ones. i think they’re fine, personally, and i own 60s ones as well. Construction is different from the originals but it’s ballpark. Very well covered on GAD’s Guild pages website.

NB 2000 is the correct designation. Dynasonic was Gretsch’s rebranding. So these are 2000s, as are the 60s ones. The 2Ks look the same but have bar magnets under the bobbins.
 

HeyMikey

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
4,869
Location
MA
Guild Total
9
Thanks Parker.

So from this old post by Neal the new DeArmond 2000’s would be similar to #3 from the mid 2000’s, correct? If so it seems like a good idea to just grab a set now for possible use down the road.

GAD would know better than I about fit.

My point is that there are six different “Dynasonics”

1. The original ‘’50’s DeArmond Dynasonics
2. Early 2000’s DeAmond 2K
3. Mid 2000’s DeArmond 2000
4. Gretsch Dynasonics for their Proline Series
5. TV Jones T-Armand
6. Seymour Duncan Dynasonics
 

parker_knoll

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
410
Location
London
Gary has what you need:


The current 2000s are the same as the 2000s 2000s. Confused yet? Read the post :)
 

parker_knoll

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
410
Location
London
the new ones are the same as the second round of ‘90s ones. i think they’re fine, personally, and i own 60s ones as well. Construction is different from the originals but it’s ballpark. Very well covered on GAD’s Guild pages website.

NB 2000 is the correct designation. Dynasonic was Gretsch’s rebranding. So these are 2000s, as are the 60s ones. The 2Ks look the same but have bar magnets under the bobbins.
But to clarify further, the current Gretsch Dynasonics and TV Jones/Seymour Duncan production are reissues of the '60s model with the huge polepieces. The current Guild is a reissue of the early 00s model and appears to be identifical to the 2000 of that era with short polepieces. They all look basically the same from the top which doesn't help. Price is your best guide. They are all very tall pickups and will NOT substitute for a P90 or a humbucker in most cases due to height.
 

Walter Broes

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
5,927
Reaction score
2,026
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
The current ones are wound hotter than the 90's ones, and you can hear it and feel it in the way they hit an amp. It doesn't make them sound like the originals though - they have a bit of a severely overwound Fender sound - the midrange takes over. And they're not as loud and huge sounding

The TV Jones pickups are not copies of the originals either - the magnets are the same diameter, but much shorter. Compared to the originals, they compress a little. The originals mantain that "Clang!" no matter how hard you play.

The Gabojo pickups áre copies of the originals, same coil wire, same long magnets - but you can only get them humbucker, P90, or Filtertron sized.

The current Gretsch ones have the long magnets, but they're wound less hot than the originals. I don't know if that's because they're using bigger coil wire or just less of the correct stuff. (44 awg) They actually sound great as a neck pickup, but they're impossible to balance as a set. I had a buddy wind one to almost 12K years ago, and it sounded great!
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
461
Reaction score
186
Location
North Zeamaizistan
The current ones are wound hotter than the 90's ones, and you can hear it and feel it in the way they hit an amp. It doesn't make them sound like the originals though - they have a bit of a severely overwound Fender sound - the midrange takes over. And they're not as loud and huge sounding

The TV Jones pickups are not copies of the originals either - the magnets are the same diameter, but much shorter. Compared to the originals, they compress a little. The originals mantain that "Clang!" no matter how hard you play.

The Gabojo pickups áre copies of the originals, same coil wire, same long magnets - but you can only get them humbucker, P90, or Filtertron sized.

The current Gretsch ones have the long magnets, but they're wound less hot than the originals. I don't know if that's because they're using bigger coil wire or just less of the correct stuff. (44 awg) They actually sound great as a neck pickup, but they're impossible to balance as a set. I had a buddy wind one to almost 12K years ago, and it sounded great!

It’s been a long time since I’ve been inside it, but I’m almost certain that the TVJ T’Armond pickups I installed in my Duo Jet ~10 years ago hd full-sized magnets, just like the Gretsch pickups I pulled out. I wonder if they changed to a single unified (and smaller) design for consistency and cost across their different mounts.

I wonder if that accounts for my different experience of them compared to some of you.
 

Walter Broes

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
5,927
Reaction score
2,026
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
T-Armond.jpg
 
Top