Speaking of counterfeit Guilds...

walrus

Reverential Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
24,025
Reaction score
8,113
Location
Massachusetts
I thought this ad was pretty funny! And pretty brazen! I wonder if one them is really a Guild or if it's two Takamines?

ou2qhfk9vrvgdufzwspr.jpeg

walrus
 

Rambozo96

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2020
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
1,192
Location
Texas
Guild Total
5
What they don’t mention is the Takamine is likely all laminate.
 

wileypickett

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
4,573
Location
Cambridge, MA
I have the Guild-ish Takamine 12-string brother to those guitars and I can tell you that the difference is more than the price!

It's a funny ad -- I always assumed that those early Takamine Guild and Martin copies were ones that they surreptitiously snuck onto the marketplace. But it appears they were marketed as lookalike budget versions of the models they copied. Surprised to learn that.

People refer to them as "lawsuit guitars" -- did Guild or Martin actually file lawsuits, or cease-and-desist letters, I wonder?

Here's one of their Martin 12-string copies for sale in Providence, RI:

 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,116
Reaction score
7,546
Location
Central Massachusetts
Boy, that sure *is* brazen! Although, I must say, that's the kind of advertising I like! Go for the jugular!

Those Tak F-512 copies fetch pretty good prices these days, too. Having said that, I'm sure Glenn's right about the comparison... If you're gonna' take on the king (F-512), you better know what you're doing! Anyway, certainly good for a chuckle!
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,756
Reaction score
8,888
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
Tangential comments.

Not all "lawsuit guitars" were actually involved in litigation. The term seems to have evolved to mean something like "blatant copy".

Since words are important, the definition of counterfeit includes an intent to deceive.

Many of these copies are just that, copies. The intent was not to have a buyer buy one thinking they were getting a Guild. The intent was to have a buyer buy one instead of a Guild.
 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,102
Reaction score
6,728
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
I have the Guild-ish Takamine 12-string brother to those guitars and I can tell you that the difference is more than the price!

It's a funny ad -- I always assumed that those early Takamine Guild and Martin copies were ones that they surreptitiously snuck onto the marketplace. But it appears they were marketed as lookalike budget versions of the models they copied. Surprised to learn that.

People refer to them as "lawsuit guitars" -- did Guild or Martin actually file lawsuits, or cease-and-desist letters, I wonder?

Here's one of their Martin 12-string copies for sale in Providence, RI:

I had a Takamine F340S for a while, and it was their Martin D18 clone. The "S" in this case stood for solid top (sides and back were laminated), and there was a version with no "S" that had a laminated top. It looked just like a D18, and was actually a surprisingly good guitar.

69E06EEC-B4C4-4F77-95AC-1690B47E9872.jpeg


I heard somewhere that there weren't any actual lawsuits involved with these guitars, but there were quite a few cease and desist letters I'm sure. Takamine still makes this model, but post '70s examples have their traditional headstock.
 

GAD

Reverential Morlock
Über-Morlock
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
23,063
Reaction score
18,712
Location
NJ (The nice part)
Guild Total
112
Didn’t Gibson sue Ibanez? I’m too lazy to look it up.
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,500
Reaction score
9,024
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
I thought this ad was pretty funny! And pretty brazen! I wonder if one them is really a Guild or if it's two Takamines?
The ad shows:
"The Guild (on the left) costs about $850 and is well worth it.
The Takamine about $225.
And worth a lot more.
"

Ralf
 

Guildedagain

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
9,100
Reaction score
7,264
Location
The Evergreen State
Yes, Fender and Gibson both had some sort of cease and desist order, but instead, Fender lost the Fullerton plant buying the company back from CBS and moved all production to Japan for about 2 years, around 1982.

Gibson struck a similar deal and the Orvilles and Orville by Gibsons (USA pickups) were born.

Other companies kept copying like crazy, as we all know.

The term lawsuit is now widely applied to just about any copy guitar to boost the price somehow. It's a legend based thing.

Did Martin ever threaten to sue Tak for the blatant copies?

I don't know.

There was a beat up F-365 or something like that copy of a Guild floating around this area on CL for a while. I'd seen it and played it at a pawn shop it had been dropped and broken, neck block shifted badly, as you can expect it played terrible and sounded even worse.

Somebody bought it and then spent a year embarrassing himself advertising on CL as "better than a Guild", in miserable condition, it was still better.

It's all legend, just pure legend.
 

merlin6666

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
1,183
Reaction score
319
Location
Canada .... brrr
Didn’t Gibson sue Ibanez? I’m too lazy to look it up.
Yes I think it was mainly about electric guitars. Keep in mind that in the 70s both Fender and Gibson were owned by other corporations and quality of their instruments was low. The Japanese clones were way better at a lower price point. I still cherish my mid 70s Ibanez Telecaster Deluxe copy. Even on the acoustic side when I bought my first "good" guitar I picked a Suzuki D42 copy over the three Martin D18s in the store that were just marginally more expensive, as it just seemed to sound better to my untrained ear. Of course a poor decision in hindsight as the D18s would have several times the value of it now. But I still have a soft spot for old Japanese guitars.
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,116
Reaction score
7,546
Location
Central Massachusetts
Didn’t Gibson sue Ibanez? I’m too lazy to look it up.
Norlin (Gibson's parent at the time) sued Hoshino (Ibanez's parent)... As far as I know, that was the only real lawsuit that occurred during the era, but I'm sure the threat was real to all the Japanese companies doing this. Norlin and Hoshino settled out-of-court, by the way.
 

wileypickett

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
4,573
Location
Cambridge, MA
Boy, that sure *is* brazen! Although, I must say, that's the kind of advertising I like! Go for the jugular!

Those Tak F-512 copies fetch pretty good prices these days, too. Having said that, I'm sure Glenn's right about the comparison... If you're gonna' take on the king (F-512), you better know what you're doing! Anyway, certainly good for a chuckle!

The Takamine F512 copy is not bad. (I still have it.) But it's for sure a few miles shy of the mark in comparison with the original.
 
Last edited:

Bernie

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2018
Messages
771
Reaction score
302
Location
Occitania
I still have my Takamini, but about it's 20th birthday the bridge exploded while I was playing, leaving me with not even one string left to play... Figure you're on stage when it happens, and that you didn't bring/didn't have a spare guitar !!! (I was doing live work still). Ever since then, my opinion on the make has lowered and lowered...BTW the bridge was directly copied from Lowden (not the wood choosing hopefully I'd bet).
 
Last edited:
Top