Smaller sized bodies of the Starfire

Jszfunk

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2021
Messages
18
Reaction score
9
Guild Total
0
Just wondering if it has ever been considered by Guild to build a smaller size hollowbody version on the Starfire. The reason why I ask is that Gibson/Epiphone has the 339 which is a smaller size of the 335, Gretsch has the streamliner series ,D'angelico also makes a smaller hollow body model.
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,772
Reaction score
8,901
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
There are vintage models that are not named "Starfire" but have some specs similar to a Starfire. There was a special run of Starfires in the 2010's ("GSR") that have different body shapes and dimensions. There is a strong belief that Guild built the bodies in the 1990's as an experiment that did not get to market. Of course those are expensive and rare. But for the most part Starfire dimensions are consistent.
 

Default

Super Moderator
Platinum Supporting
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
13,654
Reaction score
3,084
Location
Philly, or thereabouts
Guild Total
11
The GSR SF6 (not Starfire) are 335 shaped and sized. I have never seen any Guild branded smaller bodied double cutaways.
 

AcornHouse

Venerated Member
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
10,333
Reaction score
7,588
Location
Bidwell, OH
Guild Total
21
In a way, the Aristocrat and Freshman WERE Guild’s smaller body hollowbodies. I like how Guild never felt the need to have 2000 “different” models with minor differences, trying to cover every possible niche market.

And personally, with the thinness of the Starfire design, I don’t feel the need for a smaller body version (and I love small body Guilds in the acoustics.)
 

GAD

Reverential Morlock
Über-Morlock
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
23,172
Reaction score
18,901
Location
NJ (The nice part)
Guild Total
112
In a way, the Aristocrat and Freshman WERE Guild’s smaller body hollowbodies. I like how Guild never felt the need to have 2000 “different” models with minor differences, trying to cover every possible niche market.

And personally, with the thinness of the Starfire design, I don’t feel the need for a smaller body version (and I love small body Guilds in the acoustics.)

Starfires are just too big for some people. My daughter can't play my SF4s.
 

parker_knoll

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
411
Location
London
In a way, the Aristocrat and Freshman WERE Guild’s smaller body hollowbodies. I like how Guild never felt the need to have 2000 “different” models with minor differences, trying to cover every possible niche market.

And personally, with the thinness of the Starfire design, I don’t feel the need for a smaller body version (and I love small body Guilds in the acoustics.)
Yep, I was going to chime in and say Freshman.
 

hearth_man

Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
484
Reaction score
453
Location
Eastern, PA
In a way, the Aristocrat and Freshman WERE Guild’s smaller body hollowbodies. I like how Guild never felt the need to have 2000 “different” models with minor differences, trying to cover every possible niche market.

And personally, with the thinness of the Starfire design, I don’t feel the need for a smaller body version (and I love small body Guilds in the acoustics.)
I agree. I would consider the original Aristocrat an Freshman guitars to be Guild's small hollow body archtops. I'm still keeping an eye out for a nice 60s Freshman.
 

matsickma

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2005
Messages
4,300
Reaction score
1,052
Location
Coopersburg, PA
I recall that the "M" designation stood for "Miniature". I believe it was Guilds attempt to build a miniature X175 to fill the guitar line gap set by the release of the Les Paul. Totally different designs of a hollow body M75 and M65 verses a Les Paul but the guitar size was more manageable.

I have M65's but still regret selling the late 50's sunburst and the red M65's with Franz pickup!
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,500
Reaction score
9,024
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
They sold a mini-Starfire under the Burnside by Guild brand.
Burnside by Guild "Mini-Starfire BE-110", the one sold by Heritage Auctions. And yes, very hard to find.

1656596679891.png1656596710507.png

Ralf
 
Last edited:

Default

Super Moderator
Platinum Supporting
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
13,654
Reaction score
3,084
Location
Philly, or thereabouts
Guild Total
11
You're right but in a world where we can argue about what instrument Guild called a "Starfire I" in the 70's (guitar or bass?) I'm not going to get too concerned.
It was named SF6 because Washburn owned the Starfire moniker at the time, for clarity.
 

mavuser

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
8,240
Reaction score
2,763
Location
New York
Just wondering if it has ever been considered by Guild to build a smaller size hollowbody version on the Starfire. The reason why I ask is that Gibson/Epiphone has the 339 which is a smaller size of the 335, Gretsch has the streamliner series ,D'angelico also makes a smaller hollow body model.
a Bluesbird/Nightbird/Nightingale are chambered and actually are about the same size body as a 339- as an epiphone 339 hard case (not gibson) fits those guitars perfectly. those Guilds are not double cut, and have necks mounted at 16th vs. 18th fret. but they are real nice. nothing sounds like a Starfire 4/5/6 though
 

mavuser

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
8,240
Reaction score
2,763
Location
New York
in fact my 1971 M-75 with HB-1's sounds very, very close to my 1998 SF-4 with Duncans....
I agree that those Duncan SD-1's sound wonderfull, and the neck pickup in particular is as warm and punchy as an HB-1 (can say the same for some Dimarzios as well). I don't know what strings u have on the SF-4, but with 11's tuned standard, it should have a semi-hollow acoustic type resonance that a 71 solid M-75 would not typically have.

I will say when I write "HB-1" I am generally speaking of the early ones 1970-1971, and your post is spot on tone-wise. 90s Guild pikcups seem hotter like 70/71 (whether they be Guild, Duncan, or Dimarzio). The Fender buckers actually sound great as well (just got a questionable review online that went viral, thats all!)
 

walrus

Reverential Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
24,047
Reaction score
8,126
Location
Massachusetts
The smaller body (15" lower bout), among other things, is why I love my '09 Sadowsky Semi-Hollow.

2009 Sadowsky Semi-Hollow new knobs.jpg

walrus
 

krysh

Guildarist in the mod squad
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
4,431
Reaction score
909
Location
near hamburg*germany
Guild Total
6
I agree that those Duncan SD-1's sound wonderfull, and the neck pickup in particular is as warm and punchy as an HB-1 (can say the same for some Dimarzios as well). I don't know what strings u have on the SF-4, but with 11's tuned standard, it should have a semi-hollow acoustic type resonance that a 71 solid M-75 would not typically have.

I will say when I write "HB-1" I am generally speaking of the early ones 1970-1971, and your post is spot on tone-wise. 90s Guild pikcups seem hotter like 70/71 (whether they be Guild, Duncan, or Dimarzio). The Fender buckers actually sound great as well (just got a questionable review online that went viral, thats all!)
My M-75 is hollow with a soundpost under the bridge, that‘s why they are so close and why I love my M-75 so much. And I play D‘Addario 11s in 432Hz Tuning on both
 

mavuser

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
8,240
Reaction score
2,763
Location
New York
My M-75 is hollow with a soundpost under the bridge, that‘s why they are so close and why I love my M-75 so much. And I play D‘Addario 11s in 432Hz Tuning on both
ooh very nice!
 
Top