NGD: Orpheum rosewood slope-shoulder prototype

jeffcoop

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
773
The blue marquetry, the regular (non-Custom Shop) label--it must be an Orpheum prototype!

orph-front-marq-1000.jpg


More later.
 

jeffcoop

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
773
No time for proper pictures today, and very little time to play. The guitar is in beautiful condition. It doesn't seem brand new--no surprise for a three-year-old instrument that, among other things, presumably was passed around a fair bit at a trade show. But there are no distinguishable dings or scratches. It plays nicely. I'm reserving judgment on the tone until I can get some new strings on it--the current strings are old and tired, and the guitar suffers for it. There's definitely potential, though. Appearance-wise, it's nice to have an Orpheum that doesn't look like it belongs in a Star Trek episode.

orph-full-900.jpg
 

Neal

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
4,870
Reaction score
1,676
Location
Charlottesville, VA
Congratulations. She is quite a looker.

I have Elixer Nanoweb PB Mediums on my 12-fretter, after trying a lot of different types and gauges. That Adi top needs big strings, IMO.
 

Max5

Junior Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Location
Upstate, NY
Very nice. How does it compare to your OM Orph? Are they both prototypes?

I have a '13 proto OM rosewood that I got from twocorgis last year, great guitars with a solid deep percussive tone (somewhat like a good Gibson has). I am using EXP's PB, light gauge right now, going to try Martin Retro's next.
 

bbmclean1st

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2015
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Location
New York, NY
Not to say it's out of the realm of possibility, but at a glance it appears the label includes a serial number. That would be an indication that this particular instrument is not a prototype but was intended for the retail market.

From what I understand about NH models, some prototypes intended to be on display in the factory itself would be given labels, but not generally serial nos. Others made strictly for experimentation/builder's reference might not have bothered with adding a label.
 

Neal

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
4,870
Reaction score
1,676
Location
Charlottesville, VA
First thing I had to appreciate, with respect to tone, is this: An Orpheum slope-shouldered dread doesn't sound like a traditional Guild dread. It sounds like a traditional '30's-era Gibson. Huge difference.
 

txbumper57

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
7,602
Reaction score
96
Location
Texas
Not to say it's out of the realm of possibility, but at a glance it appears the label includes a serial number. That would be an indication that this particular instrument is not a prototype but was intended for the retail market.

From what I understand about NH models, some prototypes intended to be on display in the factory itself would be given labels, but not generally serial nos. Others made strictly for experimentation/builder's reference might not have bothered with adding a label.

If you look closely at the label under description it states that it is a prototype. You can make out the last part of the word "Prototype" in the photo that is posted. Probably the reason Guitar Center listed it as a prototype as well is that it is on the label. All of the Orpheum Prototypes had the Blue Marquetry for the soundhole rosette and all of the ones I have seen have a serial number on the label as well. Production Orpheums had the red/brown marquetry rosette around the soundhole. This was the way to distinguish between the Prototypes and the production runs. There is no doubt that this is a prototype Orpheum.

TX
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,334
Reaction score
7,691
Location
Central Massachusetts
It's definitely one of the early prototypes with the blue rosette, guys. They showed several of these at various trade shows before the line was actually introduced, but the blue rosette did not make it into production.
 

bobouz

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
2,283
Reaction score
1,883
I had watched this listing for the past few weeks with interest,
but am already well covered with Gibson slope-shoulder dreads.

Congrats & enjoy!
 

jeffcoop

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
773
If you look closely at the label under description it states that it is a prototype. You can make out the last part of the word "Prototype" in the photo that is posted. Probably the reason Guitar Center listed it as a prototype as well is that it is on the label. All of the Orpheum Prototypes had the Blue Marquetry for the soundhole rosette and all of the ones I have seen have a serial number on the label as well. Production Orpheums had the red/brown marquetry rosette around the soundhole. This was the way to distinguish between the Prototypes and the production runs. There is no doubt that this is a prototype Orpheum.

TX

Yes, this one is unusual (no for Orpheums, I think, but for prototypes in general) in that it has a regular serial number (third guitar finished on January 15, 2013--cutting it a bit close for NAMM!) and yet is clearly designated "prototype" on the label.

orph-label800.jpg
 

jeffcoop

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
773
More pics are coming. I haven't had a chance to get new strings on it yet. I did a quick side-by-side with the OM this morning. The OM, with fresher but not brand new strings, sounds livelier, with better treble; that's what you'd expect under the circumstances, I think. Strings will have to wait for the weekend in all likelihood.
 
Top