WTB Hoboken F-47

Wanted to Buy

JohnPaulD

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Messages
64
Reaction score
36
Guild Total
0
I know, it’s a silly reason not to buy a guitar but I’m sure everyone has something that would deter them from buying. Ever go on the Martin guitar forum? They’re all looney over there!!

Just kidding, I’ve had nothing but good experiences with everyone there. All good people.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
I prefer all-original as much as possible, but I’m also a realist.

I actually also prefer an acoustic guitar strap to be tied to the headstock vs the back of neck, in terms of balance and feel.

However, if I get a vintage guitar that has a strap button, I simply use it- like my ‘66 Gibson J50. In this case, it actually looks like it was probably added in the ‘60s-‘70s, so this button is now “vintage”, and part of the guitar’s story. My particular guitar also has replaced tuners (exact replicas, so not a huge deal), and what appears to be a very well matched plugged jack hole in the lower side.

What bugs me are the irreversible mods. Electronics, jacks, and pins can be reversed. But the most common mods on vintage guitars that I’ve seen are bridge replacements and tuners. More often than not, Gibsons of the ‘60s have the ADJ bridges removed entirely, which is odd since that is one of the biggest aspects of their 1960s sound IMO. Guilds often have bridges replaced without the buyers or sellers even being aware, so that would be the one to watch out for and look closely for. I assume this was usually done during neck resets on guitars that had previously had their bridges shaved.
 

Heath

Member
Joined
May 29, 2019
Messages
445
Reaction score
561
I agree a strap button would be easy to just remove and fill. Seems a crazy reason to turn down the right guitar with such an easy fix.
 

richt54

Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Messages
263
Reaction score
314
Guild Total
1
When were the F-47's first made. I just sold my Martin to a interesting fellow that had a mid 50's version of one of these. It was just a picture and other than the burst finish what he pointed out was the different logo that Guild used back in the mid 50's.
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
When were the F-47's first made. I just sold my Martin to a interesting fellow that had a mid 50's version of one of these. It was just a picture and other than the burst finish what he pointed out was the different logo that Guild used back in the mid 50's.
That would have been an F40, with an arched maple back and the "lipstick" headstock. F47, with flatback 'hog body wasn't introduced until '64 when it replaced the F40. ;)
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
A shaved bridge, if you liked a guitar enough, could be laminated with a BRW sliver, almost unnoticeably.

The bridge on the Austin Vint. F-47 looks like a replaced newer bridge style, but the '58 F-40 on the site looks sweet.

Prices are nuts everywhere.
Original '64 bridge and 'guard:

whfpuwtk1hka4zfk8hfy.jpg
 

richt54

Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Messages
263
Reaction score
314
Guild Total
1
That would have been an F40, with an arched maple back and the "lipstick" headstock. F47, with flatback 'hog body wasn't introduced until '64 when it replaced the F40. ;)
That’s some real “I know Guild” details. No wonder you’re a “Reverential member”. I salute you sir and thank you as well.
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
That’s some real “I know Guild” details. No wonder you’re a “Reverential member”. I salute you sir and thank you as well.
Actually "Reverential" is due to post count, but thanks. :)

I consider that 16" lower bout F-body to be Guild's single most versatile platform. More variations and combinations of body woods, back styles, and scale lengths than any other body. The one thing they didn't offer was a shortscale (24-3/4) with a 1-11/16 nut, they're universally 1-5/8" that I've ever seen and were spec'd that way when they were shortscale and even 25-5/8" scale like my F65ce.

My unicorn is an F47rce with shortscale and 1-11/16 nut. But I'm thinking I might entirely happy with @Westerly Wood (ex-Walrus)'s F30r (15" lower bout), it's got tone to die for, if he ever decides to pass it on.

I love my dreads but an F-body's so much more comfortable to play these days.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA

Norrissey

Senior Member
Platinum Supporting
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
1,181
Reaction score
1,383
Location
Southern California
Guild Total
10
Something looks very wrong there, as the label has a ‘90s-later sticker?
That sticker is out of place - weird. The serial number on the headstock - is it 68633? - is a 1972 serial number though.
I can't tell the difference between a heavy build F47 and an F48 in a photo perhaps someone else can weigh in on that but this guitar does look like a jumbo.
 

hansmoust

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
9,234
Reaction score
3,598
Location
Netherlands

Westerly Wood

Venerated Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
13,439
Reaction score
6,674
Guild Total
2
That would have been an F40, with an arched maple back and the "lipstick" headstock. F47, with flatback 'hog body wasn't introduced until '64 when it replaced the F40. ;)
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL! You are back? My older brother finally has returned. This is a great day.
 

dpc915

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2021
Messages
409
Reaction score
378
Guild Total
0
Top