One thing that particularly amazed me was the nearly complete lack of information from the company. At best, it strikes me as quite insensitive to a whole lot of guitar lovers. They had a beautiful line of high quality guitars with a reputation and following that went back some 50 years.
I might have missed something (but not for lack of trying) -- I've never found any press announcements or corporate statements about what they intended to do with the Guild line of archtops, before or after they simply disappeared from the lineup. Buying and burying a high-end brand name as they did is certainly a blow to the archtop market.
I do suppose they gave it a serious effort, especially with the Benedetto partnership efforts. I haven't played one of those later X700s or AAs, but they have to be about as good as it can get, especially from a corporate manufacturer. But, that's probably also the main reason for the Guild demise because a corporation has far too many middle men who think they need a large share of the proceeds for executive salaries, for example. And, of course that kind of an organization is best for tweaking production costs on higher volume lines, etc. Perhaps there is no way that shareholder concerns and archtop player interests would ever match up very well.
Finally, there does seem to be a growing list of private luthiers who are committed to equaling or surpassing the quality of anything the established companies are willing to put out there. The main problem about that is when someone like me decides to tie up thousands of $$$ in archtop guitars, I felt it important to "play it safe" by sticking with name brand "G" archtops that would have a much wider market for resale if that ever becomes necessary.
George