dpicker said:
I just scanned the article and was going to post it and I got to wondering if I did post it, could there be copy write issues involved were putting it on the web. I bet there is? I wouldn't want to get in trouble over this article even though it was a great article.
Hi DPicker:
Several of us stumbed over this subject a few weeks ago in connection with Guild schematics: public domain v. 'water-marked'. It's likely that in both versions of AG, there's already some language about what can/can't be done with their content. If it can't be found, then any subscriber might want to consider asking them via e-mail about their policy re/ reproducing their stuff.
Seems like they could go either way on the subject: Yes, we don't object because, if not for profit, it serves to broadcast the quality of their content and act like 'free advertising'. They could just as easily say 'drop dead'; it's our stuff blah blah and taken to extreme, there'd be no point in anyone subscribing. Chances are they already know about this BB and the others tied to particular brands of guitars; WTH, we are the kind of people they'd like as subscribers. Anyway, wouldn't hurt to ask; all they can say is no.
cj