Almost Alive!

BradHK

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
1,084
Reaction score
2,806
Okay, I admit that I'm way past 10 on the Richter Scale of jealous that you have TWO M-75s, but the retired insurance adjuster in me just can't get past the tailpiece being a grenade with the pin pulled....
I have to admit it also makes me nervous. I even TRIED to lever the two pieces apart with no success but I am still nervous. I am keeping an active eye out for a replacement just in case and watching that grenade closely!
 

wombat

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
84
Reaction score
21
I just played both back to back through the same amp (Carr Mercury) with the same settings at different gain levels. Same strings on both, rosewood bridge on both, and volume and tone pots maxed. It’s not scientific but there were some obvious differences. The guitars sound different but at the same time similar due to the same woods and construction. The anti-hums are much more chimey, brighter and airy in these guitars. They also seem to ring longer and maybe sound a little more complex. At times the bridge pickup can sound thinner than the Franz bridge. The Franz sounds tighter, smoother and a little more round if that makes sense. The neck pickup on the Franz is very mellow, almost jazz like. This may also be because it is much lower than the bridge pickup and the volume is slightly less. I can’t imagine how dark and muted it would have sounded if I did not remove the capacitor the factory installed on the selector switch for the neck pickup! I will probably shim it up a little to see the difference. Under gain the anti-hum goes more into the crunch with an edge and the Franz goes a little more bluesy and smooth.

The interesting thing is that I then switched to a different amp (1960 Gibson GA-5T) and the Anti-hums sounded more fat and not brittle at all. The sound seemed to blossom and was very complex sounding. The Franz sounded a little dark and not as interesting to my ears through that amp. However, it had that perfect old school jazz sound when played clean.

I can’t pick one over the other as they are very different sounding. It all depends upon what sound you prefer. I am currently leaning towards the Franz when paired with the Carr amp and the Anti-hum when paired with the Gibson amp. However, I have only had two days playing the one with Franz pickups. Ask me in six month when the new factor has worn off and I have had more time with both 😏

This is awesome, thank you!

That all makes complete sense. Your description of the minihumbuckers chimes with my experience of those pickups in the SFIIIs. There's a complexity to the sound of those pickups (an edginess along with the warmth) that I don't normally associate with humbuckers, or at least those of the Gibson type. I liked your description of the sound 'blossoming' (I used to think of it as a lively sound that somehow bloomed, but always wondered whether it was more to do with the fact that I was playing a hollowbody).

Anyway, you've convinced me to hold on to my '67 and swap out the T-Armonds for the original minihumbuckers. I did have it up for sale, but I've managed to sell another guitar so I no longer need to sell my Guild. I have an M70 with Dearmond pickups anyway, so it would be good to have the option of the different sound of the minihumckers.

The Bluesbird with T-Armonds sounds warm and woody and a lot less twangy than the M70 with Dearmonds, but I put a lot of that down to the a fact that the Bluesbird is hollow and is fitted with .13 groundwounds rather than my usual .11s. I normally player Fenders, but through my AC30, the Bluesbird sounds like early Beatles!

Thanks again, Brad,
Enjoy!
Wombat
 
Top