1972 Guild S-90

Qvart

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
4,317
Reaction score
38
Location
Cincitucky
Here are some pics if anyone wants to check them out:

http://s178.photobucket.com/albums/w248 ... 90%201972/

Here's a sample:

c1414d0e.jpg


Enjoy!

('96 S-100 pics soon)
 

Qvart

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
4,317
Reaction score
38
Location
Cincitucky
Maxer said:
Man, that's just beautiful. What a nice guitar.

Why thank you kind sir.

Although I have to say if you could see it person you would see some small bubbles in the finish, a crack in the finish on the back, a bit of peeling around the pic guard, a slight bow around the 12th fret....BUT....

IT IS 37 YEARS OLD.

I was surprised at how good the condition is. I think it spent a lot (probably too much) time in that chintzy case. This definitely wasn't played a whole lot. It's all original and the electronics are solid. Tuners could be a bit better but it's not the top of the line Guild. Although an inflation calculator would translate the original $250 into $1200+ today.

Oh, and it has a VERY strong antique smell. Old piano, old furniture, antique store wood smell. Wow, that hit me immediately. Hadn't thought about that aspect of it.
 

Noun0

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Location
France
Yes, very nice :) like an old Chesterfield

Honni soit qui mal y pense, je parlais bien du meuble meublant aussi dénommé "canapé" ou "sofa" :wink:
 

taabru45

Enlightened Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
0
Location
Surrey, B.C.
Chesterfield, in 'American' is couch. Not a cigarette, if that brand still exists. Another translation, is serviette, means napkin. A caravan, in England would be a motorhome over here, a touque in Canada, and probably France would be a ski hat, I think in the U.S. . Words. can be sooo confusing, right? rite? write? Hmmmm! :? Steffan
 

mad dog

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
1,269
Reaction score
240
Location
Montclair, NJ
Q: How does the S90 compare to your later S100? Do you miss the phase switch?

BTW: It was because of lust for these Guilds that I searched out Dearmond's version, the S73. And as so often happens with experiments such as this, I'll probably end up owning a Guild like one of yours someday anyway.
MD
 

danerectal

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
0
Location
Fargo, North Dakota
Even though you're not asking me. I actually prefer my S-90 most of the time. It's such a straight-forward workhorse, that I often can't put it down. I did just start working on my 1970? S-100 and it's quickly gaining on the S-90. There's something about that early 70s neck angle that my S-100C and S-100 sunburst (or Dreamlander's reissue) just can't touch.
 

Qvart

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
4,317
Reaction score
38
Location
Cincitucky
mad dog said:
Q: How does the S90 compare to your later S100? Do you miss the phase switch?

BTW: It was because of lust for these Guilds that I searched out Dearmond's version, the S73. And as so often happens with experiments such as this, I'll probably end up owning a Guild like one of yours someday anyway.
MD

I don't particularly miss the phase switch. It does more with certain pickup settings than others so it isn't always useful. And since I tend to tune down a whole step and play straight ahead low end distortion, I don't have a whole lot of use for it. Actually, my whole set up is counter to this -- I can get a lot more low end out of other guitars/pickups, and the Marshall JCM 900 is more geared towards mids and treble (without mods). But I got it years ago when I was in a punk band and it worked great. I played an old beat up Washburn with an EMG 81 in it. I recently gave away that guitar to a needy person. Don't miss the Floyd Rose!

As for the differences: they both play great. I love the feel, design, and balance of each. Both are easy to play and hang easy on a strap. As for the sounds: The S-90 is a little wimpy compared to the S-100, but they're both great through the Marshall/Peavy cab. The S-90 is easier to get a vintage sound out of (a la Sabbath) and the S-100 (Seymour Duncans) can put out a kick ass punk/crunch sound (check out Rancid's "...And Out Come the Wolves").

The sounds I go for are along the lines of Clutch, Kyuss, Fu Manchu. Both work well for that.

It's hard to say. Hell, I even like some of the sounds I get out of that MIM Strat with three single coil Tex Mex pickups. It does a good Weezer sound.

Ugh, I see more guitars (and less money) in my future.
 

danerectal

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
0
Location
Fargo, North Dakota
I love my S-90 for a Kyuss sound. It works really well with my bassman 100. Between the pickups and the bass amp, one can achieve a nice balance.
 

Qvart

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
4,317
Reaction score
38
Location
Cincitucky
danerectal said:
I love my S-90 for a Kyuss sound. It works really well with my bassman 100. Between the pickups and the bass amp, one can achieve a nice balance.

Yep. I've been thinking of looking at some sort of bass rig.

Funny, I actually got a good Fu Manchu sound out of that cheap Ibanez I traded away and the Marshall. Treble on 2, Mid on 4, Bass on 10, and Post Gain on 20!!! (The only thing better would be a Volume knob that wen to 11).
 
Top