US recorded music industry hit $17.1 billion in 2023

ReevesRd

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2022
Messages
1,194
Reaction score
1,520
Location
West Tennessee
Guild Total
5
The US recorded music industry generated $17.1 billion in 2023.

That's according to the Record Industry Association of America (RIAA), which published its 2023 Year End report today (March 26).

The RIAA report shows that on a retail basis, recorded music revenues in the US (money spent on streaming subscriptions, as well as physical and digital music), grew 8% YoY, marking the eighth consecutive year of growth for the world's largest recorded music market.
https://www.riaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2023-Year-End-Revenue-Statistics.pdf
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,128
Reaction score
7,550
Location
Central Massachusetts
Neat. I used to work at Gracenote, a company that provided metadata about all these songs to subscribers.

That's awesome. It's good to hear that the business is booming.
 

walrus

Reverential Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
24,025
Reaction score
8,113
Location
Massachusetts
As we have discussed previously, in general, not enough of that money goes to the actual artists given the way streaming works - unless we are talking about megastars like Taylor Swift.

This article about small independent artists is also very interesting.

 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,106
Reaction score
6,737
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
Great to hear that the industry is doing well I guess. The bigger problem is that not enough of that money is making it down to the artist's level. The reason that there are both sky high ticket prices, and so many concerts is because artists can't make any money selling their music anymore.
 

Walter Broes

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
5,927
Reaction score
2,026
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
"The Industry" might be booming, but new negative records are being set as well : money reaching artists and writers has never been as low a percentage as it now
 

ReevesRd

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2022
Messages
1,194
Reaction score
1,520
Location
West Tennessee
Guild Total
5
How much goes to the artists?
Here's a link to RIAA's revenue database. https://www.riaa.com/u-s-sales-database/
It's a completely different business today.

PlatformPay per StreamStreams for $1,000
Pandora$0.0013769,231
Spotify$0.0033303,030
Amazon Music$0.004250,000
Deezer$0.0064156,250
YouTube Music$0.008125,000
Apple Music$0.01100,000
Tidal$0.01376,924
 

Walter Broes

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
5,927
Reaction score
2,026
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
There are other consequences as well.

-the majority of people who stream listen to playlists, and playlists are mostly singles. Album tracks don't get streamed nearly as much, so writers don't get paid for album tracks - they did when people bought...the whole album.

-smaller, niche, indepent artists had it figured out. License your recordings to indepent labels. You remain owner of your masters, they handle legalities, distribution and promotion, and you could usually get finished product from them at very friendly prices, so you could earn some money selling CD's on the road.
You can wax nostalgic about vinyl all you want, but CD's were a beautiful product that way : much easier to stash in the band van than LP's. Have your ASCAP/BMI stuff figured out, and if you manage to sell even modest numbers (by industry standards) and there's some sweet mailbox money X amount of time later. The band I was in for close to 20 years, niche and obscure as it may be, managed to make some money on CD's this way for years.

-Record labels have become strange, almost absurd entities now that hardly - or don't - sell physical product.
But artists still need them to a large extent, because they can open doors for you - promotional, and in the streaming world too.
It's a public secret that Spotify was built on capital from the three remaining majors (Sony, Universal and Warner) Guess who's music gets preferential treatment and conditions on Spotify?

-Labels, major ánd independent are also a little desperate. One of their prime sources of income -physical copies - hardly exists any more. In the Streaming era, for more artists than not, advances have become a thing of the past. Au contraire - instead of "just" a large cut of your publishing income and physical copies sold, the average contract now wants. ...a cut of your concert ánd merchandise (yes, T-shirts, stickers, hats, etc..) income - the two main income streams (no pun intended) artists have left.

-usually, when I talk about this, there's always at least someone replying "but..! Band Camp!" "But...there's the internet and social media now, artists can do it all theirselves!" "But....I read vinyl sales are up!". Sure.
Band camp is cool, but it doesn't make up for the fact THERE ARE NO RECORD STORES ANY MORE.
Sure, social media kinda sorta works...and not. It eats up a LOT of time artists don't get to spend on writing, rehearsing, recording, etc.
Also, trying to promote something on soicial media will have you tearing your hair out in no time. Post too little and people don't get to see your posts. Post too much and the algorithm will make...people not see your posts. You're fighting an algorithm that was designed to ultimately have you pay for sponsored posts, ads.
Oh yeah..vinyl sales are up, right? Well, that doesn't make up for the fact that CD sales are as good as dead, and a vinyl record these days is insanely expensive to produce compared to CD's. (And ship, stash, and transport on the road.)

Rant mode off. I'm still mostly happy I still get to play music at almost 54, I have some sweet gigs coming up and people show up to them. And the "music industry" might be doing great, just don't ruin my mood and tell me musicians are too.
 
Last edited:
Top