adorshki
Reverential Member
In the age old question of which came first, apparently it's not the rooster, either:
Chickens are in short supply. Blame Tyson's roosters. (that's a link)
"The meat processor, which sells poultry along with beef and pork, said that its chicken volumes have been low in part because the roosters it uses for breeding are not meeting expectations."
Sounds like a cock-and-bull story to me. Another attempt to blame increasing incidence of inactivity for a supply and demand issue.
"We're changing out a male that, quite frankly, we made a bad decision on," said Donnie King, Tyson's chief operating officer and group president of poultry, during an analyst call on Monday."
To increase its chicken supply, Tyson (TSN) is switching back, a process that takes some time. The company declined to share what will happen to the rejected roosters, or how many are being swapped out."
Hey, it's a production line, right? Parts get swapped out all the time. It's kinder and gentler than the archaic slaughterhouse model.
"Parts is Parts":
Chickens are in short supply. Blame Tyson's roosters. (that's a link)
"The meat processor, which sells poultry along with beef and pork, said that its chicken volumes have been low in part because the roosters it uses for breeding are not meeting expectations."
Sounds like a cock-and-bull story to me. Another attempt to blame increasing incidence of inactivity for a supply and demand issue.
"We're changing out a male that, quite frankly, we made a bad decision on," said Donnie King, Tyson's chief operating officer and group president of poultry, during an analyst call on Monday."
To increase its chicken supply, Tyson (TSN) is switching back, a process that takes some time. The company declined to share what will happen to the rejected roosters, or how many are being swapped out."
Hey, it's a production line, right? Parts get swapped out all the time. It's kinder and gentler than the archaic slaughterhouse model.
"Parts is Parts":