Optimal Bigsby for Aristocrat?

matsickma

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2005
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
1,063
Location
Coopersburg, PA
It's a constant debate on Bigsby type for an Aristocrat. One bigsby type puts excessive pressure/break angle and requires drilling a hole or two into the top which significantly reduced the value of a vintage instrument. Or the other bigsby model that is a reversable modification with a vibrato that has limited downward pressure so strings slip out of the saddle.

I'll be curious to read the debate!
M
 

Guildedagain

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
9,112
Reaction score
7,276
Location
The Evergreen State
Personally glad to be growing out of the need to change things on guitars. In time I even regretted the things I've done to my guitars, and had to deal with the devaluation come selling time.
 

matsickma

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2005
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
1,063
Location
Coopersburg, PA
I like to modify guitars that are beaters and players. The more expensive guitars may get modified if it is reversible.
Lately I have been picking up used NS models for modding.
Everyone need a few of their own "Frankenstein" guitars.
M
 

matsickma

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2005
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
1,063
Location
Coopersburg, PA
If you have no concerns of vintage value issue install the tension roller model and add experiment with spacers to raise tension roller to a break angle to your liking. Note that you may need to add a little block of wood inside the guitar below the bigsby screw holes. And you should use a Guildsby.

However I suggest that if you paid a lot for your vintage Aristocrat buy a used NS Aristocrat and make the mod. You may be very pleased with that instrument.
M
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,542
Reaction score
9,083
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
Just 3 example threads when searching (upper right side of page) for Bigsby and Aristocrat. There are more.




Ralf
 

Default

Super Moderator
Platinum Supporting
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
13,682
Reaction score
3,117
Location
Philly, or thereabouts
Guild Total
11
It's a constant debate on Bigsby type for an Aristocrat. One bigsby type puts excessive pressure/break angle and requires drilling a hole or two into the top which significantly reduced the value of a vintage instrument. Or the other bigsby model that is a reversable modification with a vibrato that has limited downward pressure so strings slip out of the saddle.

I'll be curious to read the debate!
M

You might be able to improve the break angle by removing the tension roller and just using the roller axle. In the video, he talks about the Bigsby not being flat, but you can do that yourself. All you need is some 400 grit sandpaper and one of the glass shelves out of your medicine cabinet. Just tape the sandpaper to the glass, and then sand the trem flat.


 

Default

Super Moderator
Platinum Supporting
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
13,682
Reaction score
3,117
Location
Philly, or thereabouts
Guild Total
11


If you go with the import Bigsby.
 

parker_knoll

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
412
Location
London
I've long rejected Aristos because there's no vibrato that works. The body is too short for a B7. You can pick up a Korean one and experiment because in all honesty I fear you may ruin the guitar in terms of playability with a B7. Others may have more experience

I might get one and just accept it as a vibrato-less guitar in my future.

Towner makes tension bar adjusters and a block that pushes the vibrato further back on the body, but they look clunky and can mean the guitar no longer fits in the case.

 
Last edited:

Walter Broes

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
5,956
Reaction score
2,075
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
If you're going to put a Bigsby on a vintage Aristocrat, put a vintage Guild B7 on it - they do come up on Ebay and Reverb every once in a while. That's what the very few Aristocrats that left the factory with a Bigsby had, so I think you'd devalue the guitar less with one of those.

Another consideration is that the Guild version of a B7 doesn't have that extra mounting "lip" between the front roller and the bridge, so it plain fits the guitar better.
The break angle to the bridge will get steep-ish, but a couple of shims/washers under the Bigsby plate at the mounting points can fix that.
 
Last edited:

Default

Super Moderator
Platinum Supporting
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
13,682
Reaction score
3,117
Location
Philly, or thereabouts
Guild Total
11
That's what I had to do with the DeA, spacers under the front. The break was so steep, the strings wore grooves in the body of the bridge. Funny how that guitar was made in a different country, decades later, and still had the same issue.
 

parker_knoll

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
412
Location
London
Lookit this cute little, stubby D'yarmun tailpiece! doesn't it look shorter than the average B-7?


they are shorter. you could also modify one of those or a B7 by cutting off the front portion and turning it into a truncated B3. I still think the break angle will be too high.

Here's an option which is reversible

462amk.jpg
 

Stefan Eff

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
117
Reaction score
92
Guild Total
1
I‘m a big Bigsby fan. Really.
D0353AE2-954F-41C6-A4C6-5BC02437B474.jpeg

But there are guitars that don‘t want a Bigsby. The M-75 is one on them.
 
Top