Yes! the 'Studes showed impeccable taste.fab467 said:And it's green! :mrgreen:
I had a '55 Jeep 1/2-ton ... same body style and army green paint ... sleepy original 6-cyl, the finest set of lock-out hubs ever made, and a set of nylon tires ... that's right folks ... the kind that after it sat for a day or so, got 4 flat spots that took 10-15 miles to round out ... it died of a bad head gasket and one or more cracked pistons.Jeff said:... In BC times (before children) I had a Willys PU, if I remember correctly 1960 model ...
killdeer43 said:What did you folks in the Northeast do to anger the weather
gods? Wow! :shock:
Inquiring minds, you know,
Joe
Neither rain, nor sleet, nor gloom of night.....twocorgis said:The old one's under there somewhere... :shock:
killdeer43 said:Neither rain, nor sleet, nor gloom of night.....twocorgis said:The old one's under there somewhere... :shock:
Is the mail still getting through? That is the question! :lol:
Stay warm,
Joe
Better than there being a '73 D50 in there somewhere!twocorgis said:There's a '98 528i in there somewhere!
adorshki said:Better than there being a '73 D50 in there somewhere!twocorgis said:There's a '98 528i in there somewhere!
adorshki said:Wanna borrow an AWD Mercury Milan? With traction control? I barely get to use that stuff except when it rains. Or they water down the roads. You know, to keep the asphalt from cracking. In the heat. :lol:
It gives fully independant rear suspension. Also makes it really hard for the tail to come out. (I'd rather not deal with that in most cars, even intentionally) And it DO come in handy on some of those mountain twisties, even when they're dry. Even at sensible speeds. Surprisingly, the Santa Cruz Mountains where a couple of buddies live, are some of the steepest on the continent, because they're relatively young and haven't eroded much. A buddy of mine who's actually a VERY cautious driver went over the side a few years back on completely invisible black ice. Just because that particular stretch was shaded virtually all day along. It hadn't melted for several days. (He lived)twocorgis said:Why do you have AWD in Sillycon Valley? JMO of course, but I hate AWD, and find it to be wholly unnecessary around here if you use winter tires. Just adds weight and uses more fuel.
adorshki said:It's a real nice car, just ain't got no "panache". I bought it sheerly because it had the equipment I demanded at the price I wanted. :|
I knew you'd understand. Simple FWD drive and/or "crossover" styling was explicitly NOT on the list for me so Toyota and Honda weren't even potentials.twocorgis said:If you think a Milan/Fusion doesn't have any panache, try a Camry or even an Accord on for size! I had a Camry once as a rental, and I told my wife "I'd shoot myself before I'd drive one of these every day". Even my Sprinter van is more interesting.adorshki said:It's a real nice car, just ain't got no "panache". I bought it sheerly because it had the equipment I demanded at the price I wanted. :|
Oh I'm sure I would have. The Thunderbird (Supercoupe) was Ford's answer to the 635csi, style and performance wise. Gotta admit, it fell short on reliability, mainly the ECU's for the electronic stuff, because so much of it was out of production and not much, if any, NOS stuff left around, as it was fairly low production in the first place.twocorgis said:You'd like my old 5er, Al.
BUT they had panache.... :lol:twocorgis said:How often did that MG Midget break down Ken? How about the non-existent syncros in the gearbox? My best friend in high school had a Midget at the same time I had my TR-4a. All we did was work on each other's cars. And curse a lot. :lol: