I got a guild today, but nobody knows what the model exactly is

lungimsam

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
2,623
Reaction score
1,688
Guild Total
2
Well whoever designed it really went overboard with the details because they put the truss rod cover on right.
 

jp

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
4,882
Reaction score
1,799
Location
Pacific Northwest US
Guild Total
4
The body looks like it would be a Japanese bolt-on neck copy of an Alembic but with more defined bevels. Very odd.

Also, look how close to the bridge the tailpiece was mounted--much closer than the later 70s Guilds.
 

The Guilds of Grot

Enlightened Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
9,580
Reaction score
4,773
Location
New Jersey Shore
Guild Total
117
You've inspired me:

Guild-Signal_1600.png

Edit - I slightly improved the G
Shouldn't it have the factory building profile from Westerly?
 

Rocky

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Messages
2,436
Reaction score
2,071
Guild Total
1
I wonder if anything is written in the neck pocket or on the end of the neck like Fender does.
I'd bet the presence/absence of additional holes in the neck would tell a lot as well.

The body manufacturer also did a very neat job of inlaying the neckplate into the body.
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,769
Reaction score
8,899
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
Wouldn't that be a "Guildenstein"?
Yes and I will adjust to use that term. It does capture the essential characteristics. Thanks.

Several previous Guildenstein mysteries were partially resolved when someone identified a non-Guild that pretty much has the same body.

So is there an obscure '70's solid body that could have been the basis for this instrument? @GGJaguar ? @SFIV1967 ?
 

Stuball48

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
2,584
Location
Dickson, TN
Here are three pictures of my S300 to match against his earlier photos.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221031_162647367.jpg
    IMG_20221031_162647367.jpg
    539.1 KB · Views: 56
  • IMG_20221031_162558544.jpg
    IMG_20221031_162558544.jpg
    520 KB · Views: 57
  • IMG_20221031_162518569.jpg
    IMG_20221031_162518569.jpg
    652 KB · Views: 55

GGJaguar

Reverential Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
21,930
Reaction score
32,281
Location
Skylands
Guild Total
50
The way the body is beveled reminds me a little bit of Hagstrom and we know Guild and Hagstrom did business together. But I won't speculate taking that idea any further. Maybe a test mule/proof of concept for a bolt-on M-80-ish model? Just no way to know without more info.
 

dreadnut

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
16,082
Reaction score
6,442
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Guild Total
2
It can also sometimes be found inside on the neck block; you might have to use an inspection mirror.
 

BradHK

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
2,733
A photo of the pickup routes (and seeing if there are additional holes under the pickup ring from other pickups) could help but it might not be definitive as parts could have been swapped over time. However, if the pickup route for the HB-1 is obviously not a factory job it could tip the scales in favor of the body not being made by Guild.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2022
Messages
7
Reaction score
6
Guild Total
1
4229A174-FE7A-4754-8245-58A156856DE9.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 47FCF03D-01DE-4F9C-8CB9-4B1AFAE58142.jpeg
    47FCF03D-01DE-4F9C-8CB9-4B1AFAE58142.jpeg
    577 KB · Views: 72
  • 7302277B-D7BD-4ABE-9BDD-332A54CCF685.jpeg
    7302277B-D7BD-4ABE-9BDD-332A54CCF685.jpeg
    558.7 KB · Views: 82
  • A8FF2955-108C-4E73-AAFA-0A5A145159E5.jpeg
    A8FF2955-108C-4E73-AAFA-0A5A145159E5.jpeg
    388.9 KB · Views: 79
  • 32175EF8-3CDA-48DA-A26A-B6EACC5BE113.jpeg
    32175EF8-3CDA-48DA-A26A-B6EACC5BE113.jpeg
    437.9 KB · Views: 79

Rocky

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Messages
2,436
Reaction score
2,071
Guild Total
1
Certainly looks like the neck angle was set with a shim before the neck plate was attached.

Not sure why the assembler felt a need for a sixth screw.
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,500
Reaction score
9,024
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
If you look at my post #31, the Guild employee who built @DThomasC one could have potentially built the OP's one even earlier. The neck serial number 140020 is something like mid 1976, a bit earlier than the bolt-on neck S-300s. And the shape of the routed chamber was also odd on DThomasC one as you see below. The neck has 24 frets already, maybe they were thinking to have the necks colored first and that was a leftover neck that was stamped but never used due to the black color.

If that shape of the body was something Guild was thinking about is unknown to me, only Hans would probably know. But it is not fitting a lot of things which are typical to Guild, so the shape is something very different.
In any case I'd say that guitar was not built as official Guild prototype, I would think it is similar to the story of DThomasC one, finished outside of the Guild factory most probably by a Guild employee with access to the correct parts. Might have even used the Guild spray booth for the black color. The harness is also original Guild but has a 1974 date code, so the pots are early.
Here's the full picture of the odd shaped routing in DThomasC one:

1668618096040.jpeg
Vs the OP's one, somehow, many of the same features in the odd routing:
1668620113898.png

Ralf
 
Last edited:

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,500
Reaction score
9,024
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
The bottom of the neck pocket on my S-300 is also very rough as you can see. They had even broken the thin wall towards the neck pickup before they put lacquer on the guitar. I guess it happened when they drilled the very long hole for the pickup cables towards the potentiometer chamber. Which was drilled from the neck pocket. Same as on the black one as you can see. Just a different location.
Definitely shows the lack of experience with bolt on necks (vs Fender) and maybe the reason the bolt-on S-300 was quickly replaced by the set-neck S-300. My one was assembled and shipped from the factory including the label inside but made from leftover parts. The (original) potentiometers in my one have 1979 date codes! And the guitar has a 1976 serial number.

1668620296677.png 1668620579939.png

1668621013362.png

Ralf
 
Last edited:
Top