Guild acoustic identification

jazzmang

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
1,148
Reaction score
0
Location
USA
hansmoust said:
It sounds like you didn't realize that the JF-55 was renamed to F-50R after the Westerly plant closed.

Ah, that was it!

I thought Westerly was making F-50Rs when they closed. Now it all makes much more sense.

Thank you teacher! :wink: :p
 

Treem

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2009
Messages
4,097
Reaction score
50
Location
Tempe
Guild Total
8
Serial number is JF500034.

Hans - What is the measurement of lower bout on the JF50R? 16"? or 17"?

Treem 8)
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,244
Reaction score
7,595
Location
Central Massachusetts
So, I know the burning question everyone now has... Is the truss rod cover upside down on that JF-50R? :) :)

That's the first JF-50R I've seen. I take it that Gruhn (and Walker?) felt that "JF" was a body style name that was for the 17" jumbos. That kind of makes sense -- a body style should have a designation. Why this particular one would be a "-50R" while the fancier rosewood model was "-55" and unfancy arched maple model was "-30" while the fancy maple was "-65" is not very comprehensible to me. It amuses me, actually. Did Gruhn really think he was simplifying the naming at this time? That's what he said in his guitar buying guide, but this sillyness in the JF series makes me wonder...
 

hansmoust

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
9,229
Reaction score
3,589
Location
Netherlands
Chazmo said:
I take it that Gruhn (and Walker?) felt that "JF" was a body style name that was for the 17" jumbos. That kind of makes sense -- a body style should have a designation. Why this particular one would be a "-50R" while the fancier rosewood model was "-55" and unfancy arched maple model was "-30" while the fancy maple was "-65" is not very comprehensible to me. It amuses me, actually. Did Gruhn really think he was simplifying the naming at this time? That's what he said in his guitar buying guide, but this sillyness in the JF series makes me wonder...

Hey Chazmo,

You need to look at the entire line from that particular period to see the logic. That also means that you need to forget about the model designations before the change and what happened to the system after George Gruhn had left the company. What George had in mind when he changed the system (although the way the system worked before, never really bothered me) was very logical. However it didn't take long for Guild to mess up the system again within a couple of years.

Sincerely,

Hans Moust
http://www.guitarsgalore.nl
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,244
Reaction score
7,595
Location
Central Massachusetts
hansmoust said:
Chazmo said:
I take it that Gruhn (and Walker?) felt that "JF" was a body style name that was for the 17" jumbos. That kind of makes sense -- a body style should have a designation. Why this particular one would be a "-50R" while the fancier rosewood model was "-55" and unfancy arched maple model was "-30" while the fancy maple was "-65" is not very comprehensible to me. It amuses me, actually. Did Gruhn really think he was simplifying the naming at this time? That's what he said in his guitar buying guide, but this sillyness in the JF series makes me wonder...

Hey Chazmo,

You need to look at the entire line from that particular period to see the logic. That also means that you need to forget about the model designations before the change and what happened to the system after George Gruhn had left the company. What George had in mind when he changed the system (although the way the system worked before, never really bothered me) was very logical. However it didn't take long for Guild to mess up the system again within a couple of years.

Sincerely,

Hans Moust
http://www.guitarsgalore.nl

OK, Hans. Fair enough on the Gruhn system. And, agreed, the question of whether change was necessary in the first place is a valid one, but my it sure has gotten confusing over the years hasn't it?! :)

So, out of curiosity, were there ever any other "JF" models produced then the -30, -50, -55, and -65 models (GADs notwithstanding)? And, am I correct that the JF designation really does only encompass 17" jumbo style bodies?
 

dapmdave

Enlightened Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
24
Treem said:
jgmaute said:
Treem...so you called the seller? And the call went something like this...Hi, you don't know me, I'm from San Fernando Valley of the Shadow of Death and someone online who lives in South Carolina gave me a link to your guitar which is for sale in Urbana, IL...so what can you tell me about the guitar...

Actually when I called MA about the Guild I bought this summer it wasn't quite that bad but the seller did wonder why she was getting my call when she put it in Craig's List so she wouldn't have to hassel with shipping...

Gotta love technology, eh? joan

Joan,

Yes and you nailed right it in eye! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Actually, I called just to got some pictures over the weekend. And forgot all about it until I got an email from seller with the pictures. And even offered me a good price for it too! :shock: :D :lol: 8)

But I have already shot down a GV52 and will be landing in hands next week. So, if anybody wants to buy a JF50R in Excellent Condition!! You know what do!! Call the seller, pretend your Treem and say that, you've called the buy guitar. And everything will alright!! :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :D 8)

Anybody know blue book and how many made :?:

Grace and Peace be with you all,

Treem 8)

I don't have the blue book, but the 2009 Vintage Guitar Price Guide listing for a JF50R (made 1987-1988) gives a range of values from $1200 - $1500.

Dave
 

Treem

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2009
Messages
4,097
Reaction score
50
Location
Tempe
Guild Total
8
dave said:
I don't have the blue book, but the 2009 Vintage Guitar Price Guide listing for a JF50R (made 1987-1988) gives a range of values from $1200 - $1500. Dave

And this one is still for sale too!! :shock:

Thanks Dave.....Treem 8)
 

hansmoust

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
9,229
Reaction score
3,589
Location
Netherlands
Chazmo said:
am I correct that the JF designation really does only encompass 17" jumbo style bodies?

Yes, the J in JF stands for Jumbo, which means 17" wide body.

So, out of curiosity, were there ever any other "JF" models produced then the -30, -50, -55, and -65 models?

Yup, a bunch of 'm and I will tell you the names, but don't ask me to write down what they are!

JF-4 ( and JF-4-12 ) , JF-26, JF-48, JF-100 ( and JF-100-12).

Sincerely,

Hans Moust
http://www.guitarsgalore.nl
 

dapmdave

Enlightened Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
24
Treem said:
dave said:
I don't have the blue book, but the 2009 Vintage Guitar Price Guide listing for a JF50R (made 1987-1988) gives a range of values from $1200 - $1500. Dave

And this one is still for sale too!! :shock:

Thanks Dave.....Treem 8)

Interesting to note that according to the Guild site, they only made 112 JF-50s in total. So this is kind of a rare Guild.
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,244
Reaction score
7,595
Location
Central Massachusetts
hansmoust said:
Chazmo said:
am I correct that the JF designation really does only encompass 17" jumbo style bodies?

Yes, the J in JF stands for Jumbo, which means 17" wide body.

So, out of curiosity, were there ever any other "JF" models produced then the -30, -50, -55, and -65 models?

Yup, a bunch of 'm and I will tell you the names, but don't ask me to write down what they are!

JF-4 ( and JF-4-12 ) , JF-26, JF-48, JF-100 ( and JF-100-12).

Sincerely,

Hans Moust
http://www.guitarsgalore.nl
Ah, thanks Hans... Of course, I'd heard about the -4 and the -100 models before, but I'd forgotten. The -26 and -48 are new ones to me. Great! Learn something every time we speak, Hans! Best wishes!
 

spiderman

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
571
Reaction score
0
Location
NE KS
The 17" lower bout width applies rule applies to Westerlys as my JF55 is that width. However the GAD is a little bit smaller at a tad shy of 16 3/4". Don't know if this is true of all GAD models, but it is true of mine. You could say it is a "nominal 17". Many jumbos of other manufacturers are smaller, until the Grand series of Martins which are 17", all other Martin jumbos are 16". Enough nitpicking for tonight.

Harmony H-173 bought in 1960 (retired)
Alvarez AC60S 2008
Eastman AC320ce 2008 BOOKMATCHING BOOKMATCHING WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING BOOKMATCHING!
http://www.massstreetmusic.com/store/sh ... id-Cutaway
GAD-JF30E(blonde) 2008
JF55 1997
D25M 1974
Martin Grand J35E 2009
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,244
Reaction score
7,595
Location
Central Massachusetts
Spiderman,

Yeah, I was keeping my question away from the GAD series; they've modified most of the specs a bit so that those models should be treated separately.

The Martin Grand J series is indeed a 17" Guild-style jumbo. Their other "jumbo" models don't fit the Guild nomenclature. As a matter of fact, the Martin Grand J12-40E Special was introduced as the first of the Grand J line last year, and it seemingly is a clone of the F-512/JF-55. The shape is slightly different, but not a lot. I guess imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
 
Top