2017 Emerald Green Starfire II

lungimsam

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
2,641
Reaction score
1,713
Guild Total
2
Recently got this used-like new! There was my chatter about it in another thread but thought I would post a thread here since greenies don't get talked about too often here in case anyone would find it interesting. Serial starts with KSG17, so I think it means a 2017 model, even though seller said he bought it from Sweetwater in 2019.

It is the CMG version before they started using binding on fingerboards, which I like because I do not like bound fingerboards. Bonus!!

Brief Backstory and purchase:
I already own a 2013 FMIC Starfire cherry mahogany Bisonic I. I had to do alot to it to get it sounding good, but finally did and that Cherry one is great now. I added a neck pup and that sounds fantastic on it.
But I always wanted a "II" model and thought one with maple would be good for variety. So it was either gonna have to be the maple finish or green version for a new production bass. Green came up on Fbook Marketplace for an awesome price and I was happy to see it was never really played. 0 fret wear, no scratches, nothing wrong at all that I can find. I drove over an hour to go check it out thinking along the way that I must be crazy to do so because I just knew something would be wrong with it and I would just have to turn around and go home without it. But I was really surprised to see it was really in like new condition, and the color was much nicer than pics online show these green models to be. I even checked to make sure the Trod worked and the bridge was good before buying it. Seller seemed to be a very nice man and said he never really played it because he didn't like the way the big semi-hollow body felt. I have heard others say the same. I like the big Starfire body, myself. He had an interesting and beautiful collection of off-brand basses. And looked like a '60's silver face fender cabinet and head I played the bass through.

Sound and electronics:
The green one already sounds great, as-is, and the electronics seem to work better than the stock FMIC pots on my cherry I bass ever did. Nice sweep on everything. On a side note, I didn't really think about it before that after going from 9 down to "1"on the knobs, you can keep going about 25% more to towards the word "Tone" or "Volume". I mean I knew the knob turned all they way and worked, but you could technically say the knob goes "9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1-blank gap-T-O-N-E" Not sure why I never noticed that on the FMIC bass I already had. Doesn't really matter. Just a curious point on those knobs that the audible sweep goes beyond the numbers.

As far as sound goes, they are very similar (neither is better or worse, I love them both) but the green bass has more kick and definition on the low E string. The tone of the bass also has more "body" to the sound, is the only way I can put it into words. Like more depth of tone. The tone is more consistent when playing. The FMIC is more one dimensional tone. Not as "deep" sounding. They both have the same string set on them. The neck pups produce the same type of voice on both basses. The bridge pickup on the green bass is waaaaaaaayyyy better sounding. Nice full tone and bright and clear. The FMIC bridge pup is alot deader sounding, to the point I only use the neck pickup on that bass.

Physically they feel the same and seem to be the same thing dimensions-wise. The green is maple body, hog/maple (?) stripe/hog neck. No binding, which I like. The edges of the fretboard finish is well done and not foggy like my FMIC cherry Starfire has.

Color:
It is translucent green. Like a Minty dark green. Not army green, like some pics online show. Lights up bright and translucent in daylight or bright lights.
Can easily see all the wood grain in daylight, though I cannot capture it in pics. The human eye is much better than any camera. If you look close at the pick of the back of the headstock, the grain is kind of fanned looking, like feathers, which is neat.
When light hits the bass some contours light up brighter making it look almost bursted in some spots. It is fun to look at. It is easier to see the grain on my cherry FMIC bass than the green bass.

When I first got it I noticed that after putting a new set of strings on it sounded like everything below the 5th fret on the E and A strings sounded out of tune even though the tuner said it was all in tune. I noticed the E and A strings were not stable and would go lightly flat or sharp alot. After straightening the neck and cutting the nut slots down to a good height (stock was way high), and adjusting the action and intonation, those strings still sounded funny. Then I remembered that I cut the string ends off without bending them first, which can be a problem with the type of strings I use, destabilizing the ribbon and ruining the string. I put a new set on and all is well now. Praise the Lord everything is fine and sounds great! I hope to play it at church this weekend.

I love both of my Starfire basses and I am glad I got this one. Having two now I was thinking if I should do different strings on them, like make one rounds, one flats. Or one metallic sounding flats and one rubbery tone flats. But which one? I like them both so much just the way they are. But I will hopefully put Hipshot ultralight tuners on the green one like I did on the red one to alleviate the minor neck heaviness. Worked great for the red bass, hopefully just as well for the green bass although it really doesn't dive with the Comfort Strapp I use. I already installed my favorite Dunlop Dual Design Straploks.

If you have a green Starfire of any era I encourage you to post pics and write a review! I’d be interested to hear your impressions of it!!
 

Attachments

  • 3A2FD3A6-CD33-4273-B975-12E83389055F.jpeg
    3A2FD3A6-CD33-4273-B975-12E83389055F.jpeg
    426.2 KB · Views: 105
  • 43D60642-033B-48D5-992B-B9309967C805.jpeg
    43D60642-033B-48D5-992B-B9309967C805.jpeg
    758.9 KB · Views: 80
  • 965AC2FE-D797-4019-8D1F-0CF8CA396424.jpeg
    965AC2FE-D797-4019-8D1F-0CF8CA396424.jpeg
    423.9 KB · Views: 76
  • FBECC77B-3B05-461B-AC07-26B5BB76A515.jpeg
    FBECC77B-3B05-461B-AC07-26B5BB76A515.jpeg
    850.2 KB · Views: 74
  • 4333220C-A759-4D3B-B518-C98B526C50C6.jpeg
    4333220C-A759-4D3B-B518-C98B526C50C6.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 71
  • 81E41530-E2A8-4A3D-AD77-4EC756472766.jpeg
    81E41530-E2A8-4A3D-AD77-4EC756472766.jpeg
    505.1 KB · Views: 74
  • 1B4D5488-A893-497C-A074-616F1AD2A0BE.jpeg
    1B4D5488-A893-497C-A074-616F1AD2A0BE.jpeg
    593.4 KB · Views: 73
  • 676BB599-A800-49EC-B5A6-B9CE9E5FBB62.jpeg
    676BB599-A800-49EC-B5A6-B9CE9E5FBB62.jpeg
    608.8 KB · Views: 74
  • 5E94B416-18E0-4EE3-96A4-F97567A61F8B.jpeg
    5E94B416-18E0-4EE3-96A4-F97567A61F8B.jpeg
    397 KB · Views: 76
  • 3F7A1376-51C5-4501-B321-0638208C1D30.jpeg
    3F7A1376-51C5-4501-B321-0638208C1D30.jpeg
    869.3 KB · Views: 74
  • 0DECB258-2F45-4281-8280-550715E78E87.jpeg
    0DECB258-2F45-4281-8280-550715E78E87.jpeg
    834.2 KB · Views: 75
  • 7C3D111E-42FD-4D49-A719-E6AA3ED78F06.jpeg
    7C3D111E-42FD-4D49-A719-E6AA3ED78F06.jpeg
    969.1 KB · Views: 76
  • 81321BEA-2126-4457-8211-340B3A50FFE7.jpeg
    81321BEA-2126-4457-8211-340B3A50FFE7.jpeg
    810.8 KB · Views: 72
  • 2F858D63-54CC-4EA6-94A6-B09C13197C2E.jpeg
    2F858D63-54CC-4EA6-94A6-B09C13197C2E.jpeg
    470.2 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:

lungimsam

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
2,641
Reaction score
1,713
Guild Total
2
Thanks, I really like it. Playing it again today I was really appreciating how much better the green bass bridge pup sounds than my FMIC bridge pup. I don't know why that is, maybe just woods are different or something about the pups.

I will say the differences in the two basses are not profound and more like differences found among two basses of the same model (which they are). Not like FMIC was doing things so different from CMG that they would sound different.

So if anyone is pondering a purchase, I think you can't go wrong with FMIC or CMG versions - just look out for foggy fingerboard edges on the FMIC basses!:) That is the only biggie I found among my sample of two Starfire basses. Of course, now the production Starfires have neck binding so no issue there.
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,792
Reaction score
8,923
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
Thanks, I really like it. Playing it again today I was really appreciating how much better the green bass bridge pup sounds than my FMIC bridge pup. I don't know why that is, maybe just woods are different or something about the pups.

I will say the differences in the two basses are not profound and more like differences found among two basses of the same model (which they are). Not like FMIC was doing things so different from CMG that they would sound different.

So if anyone is pondering a purchase, I think you can't go wrong with FMIC or CMG versions - just look out for foggy fingerboard edges on the FMIC basses!:) That is the only biggie I found among my sample of two Starfire basses. Of course, now the production Starfires have neck binding so no issue there.

It is well documented that maple is brighter than mahogany in the vintage Starfire basses. You don't have to attribute any of the difference to FMIC vs. CMG.
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,792
Reaction score
8,923
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
Would be fun to compare to vintage.!

I've played both a FMIC NS and a '66 which I think was maple. PU positions were the same. Difference to my ears and vintage or maple or both is what I preferred. If LMG NJ happens the duel of the Greenies should be on the agenda.
 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,150
Reaction score
6,786
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
He does. Vintage. He did not pay the premium once demanded for vintage Starfire basses in "green" because the seller thought the bass was black and priced it accordingly.
Actually it wasn’t the seller that thought the bass was black, it was me. Mine is a few shades darker than the one @lungimsam has, and I don’t think the woman that I bought mine from realized that green was a custom color. In the eBay listing, it really did look black. She had inherited the bass when her Uncle passed away, and while she knew it had some value, I don’t think she knew how much value it really had.
 

mellowgerman

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
4,144
Reaction score
1,580
Location
Orlando, FL
It is well documented that maple is brighter than mahogany in the vintage Starfire basses. You don't have to attribute any of the difference to FMIC vs. CMG.

With all due respect, good sir, I still have to be the stick-in-the-mud when it comes to this topic. Having owned several vintage Starfires (including two 60's sunburst maple specimens) I've found no concrete evidence of this. To my ears, they all have their own tone, character, and vibe. The 1970 (all mahogany) to my ears has been the most naturally resonant, robust, lively, and articulate sounding one --and that's with the original rosewood saddle bridge! My 67 maple sunburst, all maple and with an aluminum Hipshot bridge, actually has a more dull/dry quality to it... which is by no means better or worse, but not brighter. The 1969 maple sunburst SFB-1 also did not sound noticeably brighter. I think there is simply not enough solid maple or mahogany mass to expect the wood to "shine through", like you might with a Rickenbacker or Alembic, where the bridge and tuners are all on the same pieces of wood that run from one end to the other.
Starfire bodies have a lot of air in them, the top, back, and sides are a sandwich of different woods (regardless of what is visible on the outside), and the neck is glued into the center block. I think there are just too many variables and separate, unique pieces of wood, to expect a specific, discernible, consistent tone/resonance/character/etc. My experience supports this line of thought, but of course, others may disagree and have different experiences.
 
Last edited:

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,792
Reaction score
8,923
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
My documentation consists of mgod and others on LTG. There may have been discussion on The Dude Pit but I can certainly try and remember mgod and mellogerman might not quite agree next time.

In my obsessive comparisons the vintage Bisonic made all the difference. To me the vintage sounded better no matter what position the pickup was in or what the body laminates were :)
 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,150
Reaction score
6,786
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
My documentation consists of mgod and others on LTG. There may have been discussion on The Dude Pit but I can certainly try and remember mgod and mellogerman might not quite agree next time.

In my obsessive comparisons the vintage Bisonic made all the difference. To me the vintage sounded better no matter what position the pickup was in or what the body laminates were :)
What’s funny is that I think the pair of Dark Stars in my DeArmond Starfire Bass sound better than the ones in my vintage SF Bass (after getting wax potted on @mellowgerman advice), even after @Fixit tweaked the tone pots when he was eviscerating the suck switch. Neither of them really suit the blues band I’m in now, so it’s not a huge deal.
 
Top