I hadn't played a "30-minute rapid" game of chess in several weeks. Those are against other humans with a similar elo rating that chess.com lines you up with.
I find them pretty stressful with the clock ticking away. Between 30-minute games, I've been playing "the bots" for practice; you can take all the time you want, and there are scores of different bots with different ratings from beginner up to grand master.
So I played a 30-minute game today. After the game, you can replay it move by move, with simple AI commentary. But it also shows a 'graph' of who is in a better position each step of the way, according to a master program called 'the engine'.
The engine showed the game pretty even for 16 moves, then it went back and forth a couple times. Then I planned to trade my bishop for a knight
that was covering a square where I wanted to put my queen. (Took two moves to put my bishop into position.) Then I moved my queen to the now uncovered square to set up a 'discovered check' on the opponent's king. This didn't end the game, but I got a free knight out of it, putting me 'ahead'.
At this point I had 7 minutes left on my clock, and my opponent had 15. Am I going slow or is he going fast?
Anyway, it didn't last much longer. He made a blunder taking an isolated pawn with his queen, not noticing it was covered by MY queen, thus essentially handing me his queen. He promptly resigned. Yay!
I certainly didn't play a perfect game, but apparently the winner in these games is the one who made the fewest 'mistakes' or blunders.
