‘67 F47

Bonneville88

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
2,699
Reaction score
1,262
Location
St. Louis, MO
Guild Total
40
Ah, can see it now - flattened out across the top.
Recalling that D35 bridge was about right - low enough for easy action,
high enough off the soundboard.
Reviewing some photos of that guitar, also appreciating the cool "airfoil" contour in
the middle area of the bridge as viewed from the side.


tE1FmVZl.jpg
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
Bridge looks great just play it. Don't think about the money, it doesn't always have to make sense.
True but it’s always this D35 that makes the other guitars look like poor values.

The low bridge was noticeable playing. I also noticed there are some cracks in the bridge and one of the tuners is coming loose, etc. Basically just adding up to a bad deal.
 

Guildedagain

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
9,095
Reaction score
7,259
Location
The Evergreen State
My fairly clean original open back Grover '73 D35 was $600, it would make a lot of other guitar look like poor values.

Part of being a musician, especially a guitarist, is being rather bipolar. One day something's great, the next day it's not. If you're feeling the need to back out, the time is now, before you fall in love with it anyway. The stuff you mention is all fixable, only the mainframe really matters, the box they built way back when, that's where the magic is.

With my D35, something makes no sense. The guitar was obviously gone over by a tech to have really low action by way of a very low nicely comped saddle - I mean there's no freakin saddle - everyone here would look at it, say "don't buy it it needs a neck set" but more importantly that tone would greatly suffer because of it but it's just a kick@$$ guitar, lots of tone, good volume, and to tell the truth, I'm as bipolar in my playing as I am about my guitars, meaning that one day I want huge strings with huge tone and think about every note, but the next day I want to play really fast difficult chords that only really work when strings are very low, flatwound even better, so I actually really enjoy the super low action on the D35, I don't think I would raise the saddle for higher action and "better tone".

It's about playability, not every note has to have monstrous volume, and the D35 probably has as low action at the 12th fret if not lower than some of my electrics. By comparison I had another D35 with a lot higher action, a '71, and it was boomier, bassier, because of the higher action but playability up the neck was terrible.

So there you have it, loud and hard to play.

Quiet and easy to play.

It didn't take long before I sold the loud hard to play one, I got the impression Hans holds 1973 acoustic guitars in fairly high regard, a very good year, and a meaningful one for me, I was 13, interesting times, wild.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
Yeh I think I would have accepted all of these things just fine if I had paid up to maybe $1500-$1800. But coming it at $2600, I just can't accept it. Because right off the bat, I'm looking at getting a couple minor things fixed. And me being me- I know that if I end up selling it down the line, I really just could not get anywhere close to what I'm putting in.

The '66 D40 I recently bought & sold had a number of issues, but I did not spend too much so they were not much of a concern.
 

wileypickett

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
5,003
Reaction score
4,560
Location
Cambridge, MA
Yeh I think I would have accepted all of these things just fine if I had paid up to maybe $1500-$1800. But coming it at $2600, I just can't accept it. Because right off the bat, I'm looking at getting a couple minor things fixed. And me being me- I know that if I end up selling it down the line, I really just could not get anywhere close to what I'm putting in.

The '66 D40 I recently bought & sold had a number of issues, but I did not spend too much so they were not much of a concern.

I'm with you -- at that price, I'd have been disappointed enough to return it too.
 

Heath

Member
Joined
May 29, 2019
Messages
445
Reaction score
561
Could you have asked for a partial refund? Seems a shame give up entirely since it was the nicest guitar you’ve ever played. Agreed though that if that was not an option it was too much money.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
Could you have asked for a partial refund? Seems a shame give up entirely since it was the nicest guitar you’ve ever played. Agreed though that if that was not an option it was too much money.
I think I probably could have gotten something ... but in order to make it a keeper for me, I would have been looking at at least $800 back. I just doubt they would have kicked more than maybe $200, which would have barely covered tax. So I didn't bother going that route (didn't want to be "that guy" who's trying to chisel down the price after the sale. The seller accepted the return graciously- mainly because of the bridge cracks. TBH the cracks were less of a concern than the shaving ... the seller disagreed that the bridge had been shaved. So with that, I just kind of decided to let it go. Accepting the bridge shave would be admission of a previous need for a reset + bridge replacement- that's where the big bucks would have come in.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
... also should add being the best guitar I've ever played doesn't mean the most suitable ha. Like I could sense this would allow me to get into a new bag. The D35 still reins supreme for being the guitar that works best for my music so far. I'll probably still be keeping my eye out for another Hoboken of some kind ... never spending this amount again though ha. Left me with a bad taste. Well MAYBE if it's like a '60s F50 that has had a neck reset. I've got to factor in the potential resale value basically.
 
Top