‘67 F47

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
I received the ‘67 F47 last night.

4E5573E4-6489-490A-B771-37941B862AAB.jpeg
Right off the bat- first impression is it’s the best guitar I’ve ever played. It’s really balanced and articulate, deep but not boomy. Very different from the F212s, surprisingly.

It plays very well with low action, however I’m thinking the bridge may have been shaved and the saddle is low. Considering the price I paid (a lot), that’s a bummer:

FD4B828D-2AB4-4B08-8FFA-BF0E86271578.jpeg
Also has this issue (which I knew about), anyone know if this is a big deal or something to leave alone?:

4EA6A53B-7464-402F-B7C9-E795B7A18BB3.jpeg

has the cool tuners and flower-power decal:

2DEB3E56-7EAC-461D-9234-861F13E1FF79.jpeg

D8EE88B3-F4AE-4657-AE5B-50AD47F7FED1.jpeg
 

GGJaguar

Reverential Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
21,748
Reaction score
32,034
Location
Skylands
Guild Total
50
Nice, congrats! I'll keep saying it - that body shape has some magical properties for generating great tone.
 

Norrissey

Senior Member
Platinum Supporting
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
1,343
Location
Southern California
Guild Total
9
Beautiful guitar. I'm wondering why it sounds very different from the F-212s. I thought the body specs were the same for the F-47 and the F-212s.
Perhaps the slimmer 6-string neck makes a difference?
 

HeyMikey

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
5,500
Reaction score
4,843
Location
MA
Guild Total
9
Congrats Donny. She is a beauty! I know exactly what you mean about it being deep but not boomy. That is the magic with some of these medium bodied Guilds. It should fit your style very well. Looking forward to a future recording of it.
 

dashstarkiller

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Messages
19
Reaction score
28
Guild Total
1
The last pic you posted, is that the binding splitting the wood at the waist? It’s almost what it looks like.
 

davismanLV

Venerated Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
19,324
Reaction score
12,103
Location
U.S.A. : Nevada : Las Vegas
Guild Total
2
At first I thought just a simple binding reglue. But then looking at it, it almost looks like a small strip of wood (soundboard) came WITH the binding because of the way it looks when it rejoins the guitar higher and lower. Not sure from this one pic and even with some wood with it, I'd think it could be repaired fairly easily. Looks almost like the wood/binding glue held, but the wood failed somehow. Strange. All in all, though, I love that size and SHAPE of Guild!! Those are super nice guitars. Shame about the saddle being low, but in a guitar this old, you'd expect some movement. However, it could stay like this for a long time. And if the action is okay for you, then who knows?

I really like this shape and size. Are you considering returning it??
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
397
Reaction score
71
Location
Minnesota
I believe the F47/F212 difference might be in the bracing--same molds for sides and thus same volume for the bodies but very different internal structures. That's the conclusion we (me and a skilled friend) came to about a late-60s F47 that we couldn't wake up--it was double-braced and thus was probably originally meant to be a 12-string.

As for that flaw--it does look like the binding is separating for a stretch, and that crack at the upper end seems to be along a grain line. Shrunken binding is a not-uncommon flaw and, I suspect, pretty much cosmetic rather than structural.
 

davismanLV

Venerated Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
19,324
Reaction score
12,103
Location
U.S.A. : Nevada : Las Vegas
Guild Total
2
And on further inspection, possibly the wood failed at the top from an impact as there is a little ding right there. That may have started it. Curious.....
 

dashstarkiller

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Messages
19
Reaction score
28
Guild Total
1
And on further inspection, possibly the wood failed at the top from an impact as there is a little ding right there. That may have started it. Curious.....
After looking REALLY close I think it’s just binding. I think that is a small thin piece of binding connected to the body. The color doesn’t look to be wood. Looks a little more white/cream.
 

Bonneville88

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
2,699
Reaction score
1,260
Location
St. Louis, MO
Guild Total
40
Donny, I've observed the outer "wings" on early Westerly bridges - on all 4 examples I owned -
are remarkably thin - I don't think the bridges were shaved on any of them. Is there
a noticeable difference in the bridge thickness between this and the D35?
 

davismanLV

Venerated Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
19,324
Reaction score
12,103
Location
U.S.A. : Nevada : Las Vegas
Guild Total
2
After looking REALLY close I think it’s just binding. I think that is a small thin piece of binding connected to the body. The color doesn’t look to be wood. Looks a little more white/cream.
Could be. Difficult to tell from one photo and not having the guitar in hand. It would be very unusual for wood to split that way, but I just don't know. I'd say an easy fix, either way.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
So … even though this guitar is great, I ended up returning it- couldn’t justify the extra cost when I probably overpaid in the first place.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
Donny, I've observed the outer "wings" on early Westerly bridges - on all 4 examples I owned -
are remarkably thin - I don't think the bridges were shaved on any of them. Is there
a noticeable difference in the bridge thickness between this and the D35?
Yep- the D35 bridge is about twice as high (saddle more than twice as high too). In fact, it was comparing playing them back & forth that I noticed I kept tapping the guitar with my pick on the F47 (the strings were too low, so the feel was weirdly constrained).
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
At first I thought just a simple binding reglue. But then looking at it, it almost looks like a small strip of wood (soundboard) came WITH the binding because of the way it looks when it rejoins the guitar higher and lower. Not sure from this one pic and even with some wood with it, I'd think it could be repaired fairly easily. Looks almost like the wood/binding glue held, but the wood failed somehow. Strange. All in all, though, I love that size and SHAPE of Guild!! Those are super nice guitars. Shame about the saddle being low, but in a guitar this old, you'd expect some movement. However, it could stay like this for a long time. And if the action is okay for you, then who knows?

I really like this shape and size. Are you considering returning it??
Yeh tbh with shipping and tax, I was in over $2600. Thinking the neck reset and bridge replacement would come sooner rather than later … the final number freaked me out ha.
 

donnylang

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
671
Reaction score
812
Location
Oakland, CA
Beautiful guitar. I'm wondering why it sounds very different from the F-212s. I thought the body specs were the same for the F-47 and the F-212s.
Perhaps the slimmer 6-string neck makes a difference?
Could be braces as noted above, could be guitar to guitar variation (though I’ve had a lot of F212s). Honestly this sounds crazy but I think the inlays change the sound too. A bit more treble attack or snap or something.
 

Br1ck

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
1,681
Reaction score
1,423
Location
San Jose, Ca
Very nice guitar and worth fixing for sure. Have the binding reglued by a pro. It's trickier than you'd think, possibly including heat. Looks like reset time to me, but you have 50+ year old wood, which is priceless.
 
Top