Wiring Diagrams?

dbirchett

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
938
Reaction score
90
Guild used to put their wiring diagrams online. If they are still there, they are no longer linked. Are they online anywhere?
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,528
Reaction score
9,075
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
Some are online at other pages, some were saved by members. I got a few. Let us know what you need and we have a look.
Ralf
 

dbirchett

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
938
Reaction score
90
I wou;d like the diagrams for my two, the X170 and the Starfire 5. I'm thinking of adding a MV to the Manhattan.
 

Rudehog

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2012
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV

dbirchett

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
938
Reaction score
90
Eric, Thanks. Do you have one for the X500 or 550? That should be the same as the Starfire 5.
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,528
Reaction score
9,075
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8

dbirchett

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
938
Reaction score
90
Thank you. After looking at them, the X-170 uses 500Kohm tone pots while the Starfire uses 200Kohm pots. Anyone know why there is a difference? Would the lower value allow more or less treble? What difference should it make?
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,528
Reaction score
9,075
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
dbirchett said:
After looking at them, the X-170 uses 500Kohm tone pots while the Starfire uses 200Kohm pots. Anyone know why there is a difference? Would the lower value allow more or less treble? What difference should it make?
On the older Starfires like on my '67 one they used a 200kohm tone pot for the neck P/U and a 500kohm tone pot for the bridge P/U. Volums were always 500kohm. I also was wondering what the difference is.
Ralf
 

Zelja

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
3,916
Reaction score
363
Location
Sydney, Australia
A smaller pot offers less resistance so more highs pass to ground through the capacitor, therefore less highs get to the output. So less treble with a smaller pot.
 

SFIV1967

Venerated Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
18,528
Reaction score
9,075
Location
Bavaria / Germany
Guild Total
8
Zelja said:
A smaller pot offers less resistance so more highs pass to ground through the capacitor, therefore less highs get to the output. So less treble with a smaller pot.
Thanks Zelko, I see. Makes sense. So on my Starfire example that would mean a "warmer" or "darker" neck pickup and a more aggressive (=brighter) bridge pickup with the two different pot values. Obviously also depands on the cap value. In my Starfire example the larger cap (0.047mF is at that 200kohms tone pot for the neck P/U and the smaller 0.01mF cap on the 500k bridge P/U tone pot. Means again less trebble rolled off at the bridge P/U, so it stays brighter, if I understand it correctly.
Ralf
 
Top