Westerly Collection F1512 question

Joined
Feb 27, 2023
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Guild Total
1
Hi to all,

I got my first Guild 12 string, the chosen one was F1512. It was B-stock mail order from Thomann, got really good deal and paid a little bit more than 700 Euros. The guitar had couple of small knot traces on soundboard (cosmetic issue and gives more character for me, resembling a little bit of birdseye maple) and small finish crack at the heel. No structural problems whatsoever, nicely setup and plays well. So I was really happy about the deal and if not considering those small cosmetical issues, I am really amazed about the craftmanship and quality of the instrument.

The reason why I ordered the F1512 were actually reviews - almost all were mentioning deep bass and lush trebles. Thought that it is jumbo, has rosewood back and sides, so what can go wrong and pulled the trigger. But... at the moment I am quite disappointed with the sound - the guitar sounds more treble heavy than I believe rosewood jumbo should be. Bass is there but it is quite weak and overall sound is not well balanced, I would say. It almost sounds like it's over braced, but that seems not to be case - using 10-47 strings in standard tuning, there is small belly already behind the bridge. When I compare it with my solid rosewood/Adirondack dread, it is considerably quieter and does not have the deep bass, that I imagine the large body should have. Interesting is, that I don't feel the back resonating at all - both that dread and my 000 size laminated back Martin have quite strong resonances from back that can be felt with my body. When looking back bracing, the braces of F1512 are really slim and tall so probably back is much stiffer than the backs of other guitars that I have. I think this could be one of the reason for lacking the bass.

Has anybody else found that F1512 sounds a bit too thin? Any ideas what could be the reason? Or do I have unrealistic expectations and this is actually normal?
 

Longnose Gar

Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
199
Reaction score
252
Location
Boulder, CO
Guild Total
5
I had one that sounded similar to what you describe. Of the 5 Guild 12-strings I've owned, it was the least appealing tone-wise, including the cheaper F-2512. Others here have raved about their F-1512's. I have no idea if it's a design issue, or just variation between guitars.
 

merlin6666

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
1,184
Reaction score
319
Location
Canada .... brrr
With 47 gauge as thickest string the level of bass will also be limited. If I want bass I use at least medium strings.
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,555
Reaction score
7,881
Location
Central Massachusetts
Welcome aboard, rnx.

I have no experience with the F-1512, but I would recommend slacking the strings and checking that the saddle is flat and seated properly in the bridge. Also, I'd recommend a fresh set of strings, probably uncoated phosphor-bronze, to see if it speaks a little better.

Good luck sorting it out!
 

Cougar

Enlightened Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
5,464
Reaction score
3,194
Location
North Idaho
Guild Total
5
The reason why I ordered the F1512 were actually reviews - almost all were mentioning deep bass and lush trebles. Thought that it is jumbo, has rosewood back and sides, so what can go wrong and pulled the trigger. But... at the moment I am quite disappointed with the sound - the guitar sounds more treble heavy than I believe rosewood jumbo should be. Bass is there but it is quite weak and overall sound is not well balanced, I would say.
Welcome to LTG, but it's a bummer to be disappointed. You've probably seen this, but I pulled up the F1512 review by Tony Polecastro below, and you could hear the bass pretty well on his rendition of Freight Train, and it didn't sound that weak, so I don't know what to tell you. I do know that when I first got and played my US-made F512, I was totally blown away by the presence and richness of the bass. Of course a new one of those costs 4 or 5 times the F1512 (I got a super deal on mine used). It's hard to imagine what could make that much difference...

 
Joined
Feb 27, 2023
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Guild Total
1
Welcome aboard, rnx.

I have no experience with the F-1512, but I would recommend slacking the strings and checking that the saddle is flat and seated properly in the bridge. Also, I'd recommend a fresh set of strings, probably uncoated phosphor-bronze, to see if it speaks a little better.

Good luck sorting it out!
Well, I already checked the saddle and I would probably make new one, it seems that the stock one is a bit thin (kind of usual for chinese instruments for some reason) and is leaning a bit to the back wall of the slot.
I have had luck with Martin Monels for other guitars, so if I can source ones from our local shop, i'll give a try for those and see, if they help.
I really love the feel of the neck and playability, so I hope I can sort out the issues with lacking bass.
 

steverok

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2006
Messages
266
Reaction score
69
Location
Plantation, FL
I used to own a MIC Guild GAD G212. It was a fine guitar, but I sold it in favor of a USA made Guild 12-string. All things being equal, in my experience, the USA Guilds have more bass and power than the MIC Guilds. That being said, the GAD was a great playing guitar, and it did sound good. It had great shimmer and sparkle, and tons of headroom. Just very little bass. I only sold it to make room for something else, and because I wasn't using it. Now it's played on stage in front of thousands of people by a group of professional musicians.
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2023
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Guild Total
1
In the morning, I messed around with flashlight and mirror. Definetly the F1512 is not overbraced and actually seems to be braced more like in 6 string territory. Tap tone is only slightly higher than my Adi topped dread, so it should give nice low end. Tap tone of the back is quite higher than my dread, so I think the reason for sounding thin is there. I have experimented with couple of dreads before and shaved some braces, if I remember correctly, then most efficient was mass reduction for two lower back braces and getting resonance frequency of the back down made quite substantial difference and made honky sounding chinese dread more like real thing.

When I looked the back bracing of my Guild, the higher two braces are higher and thinner than those of my other acoustics, but lower two seems to be quite normal and are comparable with those that my dread has after slight shaving. But the thing is that the back of the Guild is almost dead resonance vise if I compare it to my dread or laminated back 000 size Martin. Go figure...

I listened some sound samples for F512 and F1512 and USA made one seems to be more "percussive" sounding. Has a bit more defined bass and seems to go a bit lower harmonics vise. But overall the recorded sound seems to be quite similar. So maybe I just have to accustom that kind of sound and my imagination of that overwhelming and lush "Guild 12 string sound" is wrong :) Sadly I cannot play any F512 here to compare the guitars side by side.
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,555
Reaction score
7,881
Location
Central Massachusetts
If the saddle is leaning in the slot, definitely replace it, rnx. That could very easily account for the sound not being what you expect.

Anyway, again, welcome aboard!
 

rmoretti49

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2022
Messages
118
Reaction score
82
Location
Chicago, Illinois
Guild Total
2
Have you experimented by tuning it down a half step? While you may not prefer to do this, it likely will help. I have three 12 string guitars: Guild JF55-12 (F512), Taylor 856, and Guild D212. I have had to experiment with each of them to find where they sound best: The JF55-12 prefers D# tuning, as does the Taylor 856. The Guild D212 prefers D tuning. When I say "prefers," I am really meaning that the bass response is better at that tuning without compromising the overall sound.
 

Guilderland21

Member
Joined
May 21, 2021
Messages
151
Reaction score
135
Guild Total
2
I like my F-1512 quite a bit, and I keep it tuned down a whole step - partly because (rightly or wrongly) I worry about string tension, but partly because I like the sound (and particularly the bass) better there. So I'd second the recommendation to try out some slightly lower tunings and see how it sounds.
 

Brucebubs

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
2,168
Reaction score
1,643
Location
Eden, Australia
Maybe try a set of Thomastik-Infeld Plectrum strings.
Expensive but beautifully made - soft feel, warm tone.
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2023
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Guild Total
1
I replaced the strings yesterday with Martin 10-47 Phosphor Bronze SP-s and tinkered with the saddle a bit, just a quick fix with some CA and baking soda and reshape for thickness until I get time to make new and proper one. Now saddle is sitting in the middle of the slot and is perpendicular to the bridge. Just a slight difference, don't know if these were new strings or fixed saddle, but it is there. Will try to keep tuning lower and see if it helps. I am waiting for new solid bridge pins, after getting those, I will slot the bridge, it seems to help couple the strings a bit better too.
 

merlin6666

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
1,184
Reaction score
319
Location
Canada .... brrr
It is interesting that they would cut the saddle slot too wide as that should be automated. Anyway, they sell replacement saddles for Westerly Collection guitars, maybe that will be better fit

 
Joined
Feb 27, 2023
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Guild Total
1
I think the thing with wider saddle slot is some kind of difference in router bit diameter and saddle blank thickness. I have seen this quite much with MIC guitars - slot is almost 3.3 mm wide and saddle is about 3 mm thick. Might have something to do inch fractions vs millimeters maybe.
 

maxr

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2022
Messages
55
Reaction score
18
Guild Total
2
Sounds like the OP's guitar is new, how about playing it for a while and see if the sound changes/develops? Also, sometimes a setup by a really good guitar tech will improve the sound to a surprising extent, as posted above. My son has an F-1512, I have an F-2512 of about the same age. They sound different, but both sound good for the money. His F-1512 has warmer, richer bass and no lack of it. My F-2512 has more 'clang', more wood and 'paper' (?) in the sound, his F-1512 is to my ears better balanced - but maybe that's just those two guitars?
 
Last edited:

steverok

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2006
Messages
266
Reaction score
69
Location
Plantation, FL
Sounds like the OP's guitar is new, how about playing it for a while and see if the sound changes/develops? Also, sometimes a setup by a really good guitar tech will improve the sound to a surprising extent, as posted above. My son has an F-1512, I have an F-2512 of about the same age. They sound different, but both sound good for the money. His F-1512 has warmer, richer bass and no lack of it. My F-2512 has more 'clang', more wood and 'paper' (?) in the sound, his F-1512 is to my ears better balanced - but maybe that's just those two guitars?

A father and son 12-string duo is something I would like to see and hear.
 

maxr

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2022
Messages
55
Reaction score
18
Guild Total
2
Well, the boy's probably worth listening to, but I'm not :)
 
Top