Jeff Haddad said:
I had heard that 12AT7's weren't the best for a preamp stage, maybe a high quality one like this will make a difference.
Hi Jeff: All of the 12A_7 tubes - and the 5751 - are functionally the same [two triode sections in one bottle] and share the same pinout ... tube socket connections.
All things being equal, you can substitute any one of them for any other and the amp will still work ... maybe sound not as good, maybe sound better but the only differences are each's ability to withstand high voltage and their amplification factors - by how much the tube's sections increase the strength of the signal.
12AU7: Amplification Factor = 17-19.5.
12AU7 data sheet
12AY7: Amplification Factor = 40.
12AY7 data sheet
12AV7: Amplification Factor = 37-41.
12AV7 data sheet
12AT7: Amplification Factor = 60.
12AT7 data sheet
5751: Amplification Factor = 70.
5751 data sheet
12AX7: Amplification Factor = 100
12AX7 data sheet
The 12AY7 has a relatively low amplification factor of 40; they were commonly used back in the day for capacitor input/grid leak-bias preamps like early Fenders and Gibsons that produced a sort of 'squishy' thing. With modern cathode-biased preamps, a 12AY7 v. a 12AX7 will produce the most noticeable drop in gain / increase in headroom.
12AU7s were, and are still, used as 'worker bees'; reverb drive and phase inverters; built to withstand high plate voltage but where signal strength and tone were less of a concern.
The 12AT7 and 5751 differ only in their amplification factor; one is slightly higher than the other. Respectfully and in a blind A/B test, I doubt whether the difference in gain would be detectable. Instead a listener might think one 'sounded better' .. but that difference could easily have more to do with one tube's inherent tone quality than its gain/amplification factor.
But ... if you're still unhappy with the AT7s, my offer to take them off your hands is still good!