Thoughts on Starfire IV Stoptail

Fish

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles
Hey all,

I did a search here but couldn't find any opinions about this. I'm wondering how everyone feels about Guild's introduction of a stoptail version of the Starfire IV. I have a feeling the purists might not be fans of the stop bar tail piece because it isn't vintage correct. To me the stoptail version is appealing because it'll stay in tune better than a Guildsby, plus it's the only way I can get a new Starfire in emerald green. I'm more of a dots and binding kind of guy than block inlays as well, so from a visual perspective I like the neck on the IV better than the V. I have a picture of a green IV with a Bigsby, which would also be awesome, but I have a feeling those are rare as hen's teeth. Anyway, very interested to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks for reading!
 

txbumper57

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
7,617
Reaction score
122
Location
Texas
The stop tail Starfire IV might not be what was around in the 60's but they made them that way for a good part of the 90's and early 2000's in Westerly, R.I. and Corona, Ca. So the "Stop Tail" version is not a new concept at all. Some folks like the Guildsby and some folks don't. The guitars came both ways from the factory when they where built in the U.S. As far as a Newark Street Green one with a bigsby and dot inlays is concerned, You can always Buy a Green Harp tail piece Version, buy the Guildsby separate, and have it installed to get the model you want.

Consequently I have never had a tuning issue with my American made Guilds with the Guildsby installed. If the guitar is set up right it shouldn't have tuning issues. Good Luck in your Search!
 

shihan

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
1,555
Reaction score
825
Location
Ventura CA
I have a '90's SF 4 with the stop tail. I like it very much. Great sustain, and it stays in tune.
The Guildsby is a different animal; it depends if you would use it or not.
You should be able to try all 3 types of tail pieces without too much trouble; see which one you like best.
 

Fish

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles
Hey guys, thanks for your feedback and for the education. I know that Guild started using ST hardware in the 90s, I just meant that in the early days that wasn't an option and was wondering what the purists thought of it. For example, I'm a Jazzmaster nut and I know a lot of people are against modern trem placement (closer to the bridge) or tune-o-matic style bridges on Jazzmasters; and I was just wondering if Guild heads feel the same way about anything that isn't vintage correct. In any case, I think a ST could be a good option in this case because I already have a guitar with a trem and I don't use the trem very much. And it's nice to know that you guys won't think I'm a square for not having a Guildsby on my Starfire. :peaceful:
 

guitarslinger

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
797
Reaction score
96
Location
Mayberry
Hey guys, thanks for your feedback and for the education. I know that Guild started using ST hardware in the 90s, I just meant that in the early days that wasn't an option and was wondering what the purists thought of it. For example, I'm a Jazzmaster nut and I know a lot of people are against modern trem placement (closer to the bridge) or tune-o-matic style bridges on Jazzmasters; and I was just wondering if Guild heads feel the same way about anything that isn't vintage correct. In any case, I think a ST could be a good option in this case because I already have a guitar with a trem and I don't use the trem very much. And it's nice to know that you guys won't think I'm a square for not having a Guildsby on my Starfire. :peaceful:

A Guild player may be many things...never square. Welcome to the forum.
 

hansmoust

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
9,242
Reaction score
3,615
Location
Netherlands
Fish said:
I know that Guild started using ST hardware in the 90s, I just meant that in the early days that wasn't an option and was wondering what the purists thought of it. I was just wondering if Guild heads feel the same way about anything that isn't vintage correct.

Hello Fish,

Depending on how long you've been dabbling in the world of 'vintage' guitars, you may have a different opinion on what 'vintage' means.
As a guitar repairman I can see why a player would prefer one over the other, but as a guitar historian I can tell you that Guild introduced the stop tailpiece on the Starfire 4 during 1981, so it has been a regular Starfire feature for more than 30 years.

Sincerely,

Hans Moust
www.guitarsgalore.nl
 

AcornHouse

Venerated Member
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
10,359
Reaction score
7,679
Location
Bidwell, OH
Guild Total
21
There seems to be implications that for the Starfire IV, the stop tail replaced the Guildsby in the posts in this thread. The SF IV never came stock with a Guildsby (although it could be special ordered.) The original had a Guild harp tailpiece with a floating bridge, and holds tune just dandy.
The 60s SF IV, and the later reissues are just different animals in weight, finish, feel, and sound.
 

Fish

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles
Hello Fish,

Depending on how long you've been dabbling in the world of 'vintage' guitars, you may have a different opinion on what 'vintage' means.
As a guitar repairman I can see why a player would prefer one over the other, but as a guitar historian I can tell you that Guild introduced the stop tailpiece on the Starfire 4 during 1981, so it has been a regular Starfire feature for more than 30 years.

Sincerely,

Hans Moust
www.guitarsgalore.nl

Hey Hans! I'm digging your book so far! Thanks for schooling me on the ST. Great to know.
 

Fish

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles
There seems to be implications that for the Starfire IV, the stop tail replaced the Guildsby in the posts in this thread. The SF IV never came stock with a Guildsby (although it could be special ordered.) The original had a Guild harp tailpiece with a floating bridge, and holds tune just dandy.
The 60s SF IV, and the later reissues are just different animals in weight, finish, feel, and sound.


Hey Chris, nice to meet you! Sorry, didn't mean to make anyone think that the IV ever came stock with a Guildsby and I'm well aware of the standard harp tailpiece and floating bridge on the IV. Thanks for chiming in! You guys are great.
 

GAD

Reverential Morlock
Über-Morlock
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
23,276
Reaction score
19,087
Location
NJ (The nice part)
Guild Total
112
I greatly prefer stop-tails on my Starfires, though I'd never turn down a harp! :)
 

fuman

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
136
Reaction score
136
Location
Fredericksburg, VA
I don't mind the stop tailpiece, but they have two killer finishes -- emerald green and natural -- that you can only get in that configuration. If the Harp isn't the coolest archtop tailpiece ever, it's in the top 3. They are a bit of a pain and maybe they aren't as stable but I love the look and wish you could get a green one made that way. It's mega-hard to find a vintage one in green.
 

D30Man

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
2,967
Reaction score
1,020
Location
Rockwall, TX
Guild Total
5
I too am eyeballing a Newark Street Starfire Emerald with stop tail.. Sweetwater has a demo model for under $1k. Let me know what you think of them.
 

DrumBob

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2014
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
1,143
Location
northwest NJ
My new SF-IV has a stop tailpiece, and it plays great. I purposely wanted this model versus a harp taipiece. Just personal preference.
 
Top