Jam session last night with Gibson J-45

dreadnut

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
16,082
Reaction score
6,443
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Guild Total
2
My friend's son is in a band, they visited last night and we jammed. They were REALLY good, we had a blast. Got to play one of their guitars, a '59 Gibson J-45 SB. Nice, but sounded like a cigar box guitar next to my D-25M, seriously. He had very light strings and very low action on it, to the point of buzzing if I pushed it too hard. Then he told me it had likely been re-finished too. Nice looking guitar, but I certainly wouldn't trade my D-25 for it.
 

gilded

Senior Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
3,479
Reaction score
197
Location
texas
Come down to the Arlington TX Guitar Show in October and tell me if my '59 Gibson J-50 sounds like a Cigar Box compared to your D25M.
 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,167
Reaction score
6,813
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
Come down to the Arlington TX Guitar Show in October and tell me if my '59 Gibson J-50 sounds like a Cigar Box compared to your D25M.

I was going to say the same thing about my 2005 WM45 Harry. It's one of the best sounding and playing large body acoustic guitars that I've ever played. The one Marc played must not have been a very good example of what is usually a great guitar. There's a reason that nearly every boutique builder has their own take on the slope shoulder Gibson.
 

kitniyatran

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
3,394
Reaction score
506
Location
SW Fl.
Maybe it was the "very light strings and very low action"; maybe the "likely been re-finished too."
A '59 Gibson J-45 should be a pretty nice guitar; almost as good as a Guild.
 
Last edited:

Ridgemont

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
3,352
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin TX
Completely different tone in my opinion. I really like the thump Gibson has and you will not find that in a Guild. It is all a matter of what you are used to. I spent the last week with a thumpy sloped shouldered dread while on vacation and realized it sounds just like te guitar on Dylan's early stuff when he played a J50. None of my Martins or Guild D25 can make that sound. All good...just different. I really want a Gibson now and the new J35 is a steal.
 

Scratch

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
6,909
Reaction score
20
Location
Canyon Lake, TX.
Completely different tone in my opinion. I really like the thump Gibson has and you will not find that in a Guild. It is all a matter of what you are used to. I spent the last week with a thumpy sloped shouldered dread while on vacation and realized it sounds just like te guitar on Dylan's early stuff when he played a J50. None of my Martins or Guild D25 can make that sound. All good...just different. I really want a Gibson now and the new J35 is a steal.

+1. Traded my J45R Custom two weeks ago only because my shoulders simply won't handle dreadnaughts anymore and it was spending far too much time in the closet. The Gibson thump is very unique and I've never played another rosewood dread with that well-defined growl. Love my Guilds, but the J45, when properly set up is nearly untouchable. Nicest rosewood dread I've ever owned.
 

dreadnut

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
16,082
Reaction score
6,443
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Guild Total
2
Didn't mean to offend anyone - but I said THIS guitar was not very impressive. I've played several J-45's that were very nice guitars; this just wasn't one of them.
 

Christopher Cozad

Senior Member
Platinum Supporting
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
1,639
Location
near Charlotte, NC
I played a recent model Gibson J-45 Standard at my local Guitar Center a week ago. Well, "played" is a misnomer as, after strumming a single chord, I hung it back up on the wall. There was little to no acoustic sound whatsoever - it was surprisingly "dead" in timbre (string life status taken into account). By contrast, I played a 2009(?) J-45 "True Vintage" a year (or so) ago that I recall sounded nice (warm and balanced), but the word "muted" comes to mind (wet blanket). I compare that to (my memory of) playing a 1942 J-45 that sounded spectacular (bright, loud, full of sustain). My personal experience with the J-45 has been more miss than hit. Put another way, I would be more surprised to hear that a given Guild dreadnaught sounded like a cigar box guitar, than a Gibson.
 

gilded

Senior Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
3,479
Reaction score
197
Location
texas
dreadnut,

What I'm getting from your post is, "My D25M kicked the arse of refinished Gibson J45 stage guitar with super low action and extra light strings!"
Don't you think it's sort of like comparing not only an apple to an orange, but an apple to a sick orange? Don't you think that you invite comment from people who know that Gibsons can be a fine sounding and playing guitar?

There are plenty of dog Gibsons and plenty of dog Guilds to go around. The best Gibson flat-tops are from around mid-30's through '54 or '55. They're pretty good up through '65. '66 and up have HUGE bridge plates underneath the top. '69 & up Gibson jumbos have the infamous double-X bracing that is truly terrible. After that I lost interest, at least until after the Millenium. I have a friend who has an '06-ish Vintage Reissue Gibson SJ that is wonderful. Some of the new ones sound good, some don't.

Is there an era for Guilds that are uniformly bad? I don't think so. Hoboken flat-tops are a little more lightly braced than '70's and '80's Westerly guitars, but Guild quality is uniform throughout that whole era (with Martin and Gibson going downhill over the same years). Having said that, most of the Guild flat-tops from the '70's and '80's are very stoutly built, with comparatively heavy bracing. My fave Luthier has a theory that all of these 30 and 40 year old Guilds are finally coming into their own because the wood is now seasoned. You may have a different theory.

Is there a special mojo to Gibsons that Guilds don't have? No, they just build them lighter. For example, they don't tuck the back braces under the kerfing on the 30's small Gibson flat-tops. They sound Great, but they need to be re-glued every 5-10 years. If you're a bean counter at Gibson, you wouldn't like the amount of money expended on warranty work, so you'd gradually change things, like going to non-scalloped X-bracing in '55, or slapping huge bridge plates into guitars in '66, etc. Martin did the same sort of thing, but even earlier.

How did Guild address the warranty issue? Again, comparatively heavy bracing. Not trying to rag on Guild, just the truth. In 1974, I played a '66-7 Guild D50 with Brazilian Rosewood. Belonged to a room mate of mine, so I played it from time to time over a few months, at least. It was a nice guitar, but it was tight, you had to hit it hard to get the sound out, at least more than I was used to. Roomie didn't like it that much himself. Said he bought it new in Michigan because there was a three year wait to get a Martin D28. Go figure.

That's all I got, dreadnut. Hope you get a chance to play a good Gibson some day, you might even like it. Bob Dylan and James Taylor liked their vintage Gibson J-50's back when they were comparatively new. Those aren't the type of guitars they play today, but those are the guitars they built their reputation on. Scratch, Sandy and I understand that. It's not that we don't like Guilds, it's that we like good guitars, regardless of what it says on the headstock.

HH
 

dreadnut

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
16,082
Reaction score
6,443
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Guild Total
2
dreadnut,



That's all I got, dreadnut. Hope you get a chance to play a good Gibson some day, you might even like it. Bob Dylan and James Taylor liked their vintage Gibson J-50's back when they were comparatively new. Those aren't the type of guitars they play today, but those are the guitars they built their reputation on. Scratch, Sandy and I understand that. It's not that we don't like Guilds, it's that we like good guitars, regardless of what it says on the headstock.

HH

No need to defend the Gibson name, I've played plenty of good ones over the years. This particular one was handed to me with great anticipation because of its vintage-ness, and I was completely underwhelmed and disappointed. Tinny sounding at best. Who knows what's been done to this guitar since 1959, re-finishing the top being one of them. By the way, the Gibson factory used to be about 40 miles from my house, I visited there once in the 70's with a friend whose cousin worked there building Mastertone Banjos. (Now it's the Heritage factory.) Anyway, I've played many Gibsons over the years that I would have loved to add to my stable; this just wasn't one of them.
 

Scratch

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
6,909
Reaction score
20
Location
Canyon Lake, TX.
I played a recent model Gibson J-45 Standard at my local Guitar Center a week ago. Well, "played" is a misnomer as, after strumming a single chord, I hung it back up on the wall. There was little to no acoustic sound whatsoever - it was surprisingly "dead" in timbre (string life status taken into account). By contrast, I played a 2009(?) J-45 "True Vintage" a year (or so) ago that I recall sounded nice (warm and balanced), but the word "muted" comes to mind (wet blanket). I compare that to (my memory of) playing a 1942 J-45 that sounded spectacular (bright, loud, full of sustain). My personal experience with the J-45 has been more miss than hit. Put another way, I would be more surprised to hear that a given Guild dreadnaught sounded like a cigar box guitar, than a Gibson.

All I know is that my '03 J45 was awesome. Might be a good topic for LMG. Ask Ren Ferguson why/how so many Gibsons under his master luthiership control were duds?
 

dreadnut

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
16,082
Reaction score
6,443
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Guild Total
2
Played a brand new J-45 "Working Man" a few years ago that was awesome. Just a basic mahogany box, but it sure sounded great, I sat in the music store and played it for an hour or better. That's one I woulda brought home if I'd had the wherewithal.

Regarding "heavy" Guilds, you would say that about my '76 D-25, but my '99 DV-52 is very light comparatively. That heavy old D-25 sure has some volume and sustain though.
 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,167
Reaction score
6,813
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
All I know is that my '03 J45 was awesome. Might be a good topic for LMG. Ask Ren Ferguson why/how so many Gibsons under his master luthiership control were duds?

I sort of asked Ren that Last year Ken, but in the form of "Why are there so many awful Gibson acoustics at Guitar Center?". I think the question made him a little uncomfortable, and his answer to me was "Well, Guitar Center is not really the place you want to buy a Gibson". I think there was a message in there somewhere. :wink:
 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,167
Reaction score
6,813
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
Played a brand new J-45 "Working Man" a few years ago that was awesome. Just a basic mahogany box, but it sure sounded great, I sat in the music store and played it for an hour or better. That's one I woulda brought home if I'd had the wherewithal.

That's mine (a WM for "Working Man" 45). During that same conversation with Ren at LMG3 a guitar he called "the smartest Gibson acoustic you can buy", and that made me feel good. It really is a superior guitar, and as good as any I've played, or have owned, or currently own.

Regarding "heavy" Guilds, you would say that about my '76 D-25, but my '99 DV-52 is very light comparatively. That heavy old D-25 sure has some volume and sustain though.

My '73 D50 is one of those "tank" Guilds, but manages to sound great despite that. I've found that as a rule though, the lighter the build the more resonant the guitar is. Some '70s Guild seem to refute that theory, but they're still not as good as the lighter builds, IMO anyway. Here's Dana Bourgeois' take on this, and a man whose opinion I respect immensely:

"Norman Blake once said "Never trust a guitar if it doesn't have a belly". It's possible to build a top that stays flat forever, but we don't think you'd enjoy playing it for very long. So the belly's not the problem. The problem comes whenever a top stretches under string tension, taking the bridge and strings with it, and causes your guitar to eventually need a neck reset. And any top that's built lightly enough for optimum performance is going to need a neck reset sometime during it's lifetime. Period."
 

Ridgemont

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
3,352
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin TX
I sort of asked Ren that Last year Ken, but in the form of "Why are there so many awful Gibson acoustics at Guitar Center?". I think the question made him a little uncomfortable, and his answer to me was "Well, Guitar Center is not really the place you want to buy a Gibson". I think there was a message in there somewhere. :wink:
I am a believer that the care GC gives their guitars is a major contributing factor as to why Gibsons in addition to the Martin 000-28EC have such sketchy reputations.
 
Top